My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-23-2004 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
08-23-2004 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2023 12:34:48 PM
Creation date
1/25/2023 11:45:54 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
335
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
2.Section 78-642: Commercial site plan approval for a building permit to <br />allow construction of a 16’ x 132 ’ addition to the south facade of the <br />existing building, expanding the cunent building footprint, and interior <br />remodeling to covert the existing vacant garage stalls into a game room. <br />3.Section 78-1288 (B): Variance to permit 90% hardcover within 1000’ of <br />Lake Mimietonka when 25% hardcover is permitted in the 75 ’ - 250 ’ <br />zone, 30% in the 250 ’ - 500 ’ zone and 35% in the 500 ’ - 1000’ zone. <br />4.Section 78-1403: Variance to permit 23% Lot Coverage by Structures <br />when 15% is normally permitted and 20% currently exists. <br />5.Section 78-646 (C): Variance to permit a front yard setback for parking of <br />10 feet from Shoreline Drive where 20 feet is normally required. <br />6.Section 78-1516: Variance to parking stall requirement where City <br />Ordinance would require 133 stalls and only 104 stalls are proposed. <br />WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the application; the <br />recommendation of the City staff and Planning Commission; and the comments and <br />written statements submitted by the applicant. <br />NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of <br />Orono, Minnesota hereby denies the requested commercial site plan review with <br />associated variances and an amendment to the B - 1 zoning district standards as <br />described above based on one or more of the following findings of fact concerning this <br />property: <br />1. The proposed game room use is not permitted under the permitted, <br />conditional, or accessory uses sections of B - 1, Retail Sales Business <br />District; an amendment to the B - 1 standards, which is not supported by the <br />Plaiming Commission or City Council, would be required in order to permit <br />the game room. <br />2. The proposed addition, measuring 16’ x 132 ’, would constitute an expansion <br />of the existing non-conforming use, which is the bowling alley. <br />3. The property is in close proximity to the residential neighborhood to the <br />south. The proposed addition and entrance to the proposed game room would <br />Page 2 of 4 <br />M
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.