My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-26-2004 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2004
>
07-26-2004 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2023 11:54:35 AM
Creation date
1/25/2023 11:45:08 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
196
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CITY of OROXO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. 3191 <br />4. <br />at that location. Adjacent portions of the house <br />currently exist as near as 44' to the shoreline. The <br />interior layout of the house makes it difficult to <br />expand the kitchen area without encroaching into the 0- <br />75* setback. <br />c)The proposed second story addition above the existing <br />master bedroom^ which is 60' from the shoreline# will <br />create no additional hardcover and will merely create <br />new structure above the existing footprint. <br />The increase in 0 —75' hardcover as a result of the <br />kitchen addition is 90 s.f. or an increase of 0.3% <br />hardcover in the 0-75' zone. There is no extraneous <br />hardcover in the 0 — 75' zone that could be removed to <br />result in no net hardcover increase. <br />At their October 12, 1992 meeting the City Council <br />determined that no net hardcover increase in the 0-75' zone <br />was justified. The applicant subsequently agreed to <br />concurrent removals of 90+ s.f. of sidewalk in the 0 —75' <br />zone to result in no net hardcover increase above the <br />existing 11.2% level in that zone. <br />The City Council has considered this application including <br />the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, <br />reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the <br />effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and <br />welfare of the community. <br />6.The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this <br />property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to <br />other property in this zoning district; that granting the <br />variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, <br />light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to <br />neighboring property; would not merely serve as a <br />convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate <br />a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to <br />preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and <br />would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning <br />Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br />Page 2 of 7 <br />+.!i <br />I <br />I
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.