Laserfiche WebLink
FILE #04.3026 <br />June 15. 2004 <br />Page 5 of 5 <br />Issues for Consideration <br />1. Does the Planning Commission feel that there is hardship to rebuild the deck to <br />the same size as it was before? <br />2. Is the deck “necessary ”? Does the Planning Commission agree with staffs <br />conclusion that a deck is the safer alternative on this property due to the proximity <br />to the bluff? <br />3. Are there any other issues or concerns wJ' this application? <br />Staff Recommendation <br />Planning Staff recommends approval of the after-the-faci lake setback, bluff impact zone <br />setback, and hardcover variances.