My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-26-2004 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2004
>
07-26-2004 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2023 11:54:35 AM
Creation date
1/25/2023 11:45:08 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
196
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r EXHIBIT B <br />Page 1 of 3 <br />HARDSHIP DOCUMENTATION FORM <br />This form is a required submittal for ALL variance applications. An application <br />will not be considered complete or placed on any meeting agendas until this form is <br />complete and submitted to the City <br />Minnesota State Statue Section 394.27. Subdivision 7 requires that a hardship be <br />cemonstrated in order for a variance to be granted. The hardship must be unique to the <br />property as variances run with the land and not the land owner. Personal and economic <br />situations are not considered valid hardships. In order ^or an application to be hea'd by <br />the Planning Commission and City Council a hardship having merit must be <br />demonstrated. <br />HOW DO I PROVE A HARDSHIP? <br />This form has 12 points outlining the basis City staff uses to determine if a hardship <br />exists and how the variance will affect the surrounding community. To prove a hardship, <br />address all the relevant points listed below and answer them as ciearly as possible. <br />Since you are requesting the code exception, you have the burden of proving that the <br />variance is justified. The information the City receives is what is used in determining a <br />denial or approval recommendation. If you leave something out it will not be considered. <br />Please address each of these hardship criteria as they relate to the request (some may <br />not apply): <br />1. "The property in question cannot be pul to a reasonable use if used under <br />conditions allowed by the official controls." <br />Thp Prnpprty a rp«;iHpnrp , Thp hniisp ha«; «;Sng1p r a r g a r a C <br />and with the existing zoning a double car garage anywhere on i <br />lot requires a variation._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ <br />2. "The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not <br />created by the landowner." <br />Thf> nwnpr HiH rmt hiiild fho FtvTgtipQ hnii^ta ____________________ <br />3."The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential charade' of the locality." <br />The variance will only enhance the property. The design is <br />-^9—linjrnvp ..the-..! coks of the front—c.f- tha-itcu-sa —a-c-d —i-acrease t <br />ability tn store vphirles ir«;idp in<;tPaH nf r.iitcirlo <br />"Economic considerations alone shall rot constitute an undue hardship if <br />reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter." <br />The current plan is the more expensive option. There is not <br />a econorr..i<..-ha.r4s-h-1-p.- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - <br />C JXO I (T"'. <br />r».
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.