My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-09-2004 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2004
>
08-09-2004 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2023 11:31:57 AM
Creation date
1/25/2023 11:23:22 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
195
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
EXHIBIT B <br />t !■ <br />Page 1 of 3 <br />HARDSHIP DOCUMENTATICN FORM <br />? 1 <br />♦ ; <br />![ <br />This form is a required submittal for ALL variance applications. An application <br />Will not be considered complete or placed on any meeting agendas until tnis form is <br />complete and submitted to the City. <br />Minnesota State Statue Section 394.27, Subdivision 7 requires that a hardship be <br />demonstrated in order for a variance to be granted. The hardship must be unique to the <br />property as variances run with the land and not the land owner. Personal and economic <br />situations are not considered valid hardships. In order for an application to be heard by <br />the Planning Commission and City Council a hardship having merit must be <br />demonstrated. <br />HOW DO I PROVE A HARDSHIP? <br />This form has 12 points outlining the basis City sta'f uses to determine if a hardship <br />exists and how the variance will affect the surrounding community. To prove a hardship, <br />address all the relevant points listed below and answer them as clearly as possible. <br />Since you are requesting the code exception, you have the burden of proving that the <br />variance is justified. The information the City receives is what is used In determining a <br />denial or approval recommendation. If you leave something out it will not be considered. <br />Please address each of these hardship criteria as they relate to the request (seme may <br />not apply); <br />1."The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under <br />conditions allowed by the official controls." <br />Thp Prnpprty •!«; a rp<;irlpnrp . Thp hnii<;<» ha<; ;» cLiPfflp r a r g a r a Q <br />and with the existing zoning a double car garage anywherp on t <br />lot requires a variation._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ <br />“The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not <br />created by the landowner." <br />THp nwnpr HiH nnt hiiilH th<a PVTgring <br />3."The variance, if granted, will net alter the essential character of the locality." <br />The variance will only enhance the property. The design is <br />to imprnvp_thp__1 nnlr«;--nf-_t.h-P...f rnji.t_j>.f.-tho. hniigfl..ar.H irpre^go <br />ability tn ^tnnp vphfrln*; Sn<;tpaH nf riitciHp <br />"Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if <br />reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter." <br />The current plan is the more expensive option. There is net <br />a e.co n-smic har dsh -ip-.---------------------------------------------------------------------I <br />jxo A .1
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.