My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-09-2004 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2004
>
08-09-2004 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2023 11:31:57 AM
Creation date
1/25/2023 11:23:22 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
195
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
EXHIBIT B <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, July 26, 2004 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />approval of the Conditional Use Permit to allow plumbing in an accessory building in order <br />to construct a bathroom consisting of a toilet, sink, and shower within the existing pool <br />cabana located at 5252 Hunter Pass stipulating execution of the covenant stated within the <br />Zoning Ordinance Section 78-418 (b) (e). VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />8. #04-3036 DURABILT ASSOCIATES, INC. ON BEHALF OF JAMES BROOKS, <br />3785 WATERTOWN ROAD - VARIANCE <br />Gundlach explained that the applicant requests a side yard setback variance to allow an eastern side <br />yard setback of 10’ when 14.4' currently exists and 50* is normally required. Although the <br />Planning Commission voted to approve the request on a 5-1-1 vote, she slated that staff would <br />recommend denial of the requested variance to allow the setback, but would support a side yard <br />setback variance of 14.4’ due to the existing setback of the house and attached garage, and <br />narrowness of the lot. <br />White stated that he would prefer a garage wider than 20’ to allow for storage of outdoor <br />equipment. <br />Frit/.ler indicated that a long narrow lot should be required to build a long narrow garage. <br />Tom Kaspr/a. of Ournbilt. stated that the minimum width he usually builds is 22*. <br />McMillan felt it was deceiving from the pictures to see the height differentials within the dri\eway. <br />She believed hardship could be found in the need for .in adequate driveway apron and turnaround <br />access to pull out onto Watertown Road. <br />Brocks stated that he was attempting to improve the aesthetics of tite property, as well os, obtain a <br />two car garage <br />McMillan moved. White seconded, to approve the side yard setback variance to allow a 10* <br />eastern side yard setback to construct a two stall garage due to the lot dimensions, elevations <br />and constrictions of the drivewray turnaround. VOTE: Aves, White and McMillan: Nays, <br />PAGE 10 of 14 <br />iii
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.