My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-09-2004 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2004
>
08-09-2004 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2023 11:31:57 AM
Creation date
1/25/2023 11:23:22 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
195
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CITY of ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. ^ S 6 1 <br />75’-250 ’ zone, 30% ir. the 230’-500 ’ zone and 35% in the 500 ’-1000 ’ <br />zone. <br />4.Section 78-1403; Variance to permit 16% Lot Coverage by Structures <br />when 15% is nonnally pennitted. <br />5.Section 78-1467 (3)- Variance to pcmtit an existing sign to be located 2 <br />outside the property boundary. <br />Section 78-1516: Vaiiance to park'ng stall requirement where City <br />Ordinance would technically require 147 stalls and only 104 stalls are <br />proposed. <br />WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the application; the recommendation <br />of the City staff and Planning Commission; and the comments and written statements <br />submitted by the applicant. <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Orono, <br />Minnesota hereby denies tlie requested conditional use permit, commercial site plan <br />review and associated variances as described above based on one or more of the <br />following findings of fact concerning this property: <br />1.The property is in close proximity to the residential neighborhood to the <br />south. The entrance and parking area for the proposed use directly abuts <br />the adjacent residential neighborhood. <br />The potential for increased levels of noise, traffic, activity, public <br />disuirbances, litter, damage to property, and calls to police that can <br />accompany a site whi-'h serves liquor, have a high potential to be <br />disruptive to tlie immediately adjacent residential neighborhood. <br />The City Council on March 22, 2004 denied a liquor licoiise for the <br />proposed Class II restaurant. <br />4.The granting of the requested variances would be ccnirary to the <br />provisions of Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-123 with which the <br />applicant must first comply in order that variances be grariicd. The <br />Council finds that; <br />Page 2 of 4
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.