My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-09-2004 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2004
>
08-09-2004 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2023 11:31:57 AM
Creation date
1/25/2023 11:23:22 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
195
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1 <br />EXHIBIT E <br />Structural Coverage <br />Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage <br />68,897 s.f. (1.58 acres)Allowed; 10,335 s f. (15%) <br />Existing: 13,715.22 s.f (20%) <br />Proposed: 15.741.62 s.f (23%) <br />Section 78-1403 of the Zoning Ordinance requires that all properties in all 2oning <br />districts be subject to 15% maximum structural coverage. The applicant is proposing a <br />16’ X 132’ (2,026 s.f. minus existing bump out) entrance along the southern fa9ade of the <br />building. The applicant has stated that the entrance is proposed to help control heating <br />and cooling costs and to provide safer and more inviting entrances to the building. The <br />entrance addition will provide an area for storage of coats and shoes and may contain <br />locker facilities. <br />The entrance is proposed at 2,026 square feet (16’ x 132' minus existing 10’ x 8’ bump <br />out). This is an addition of 3% of structure on-site bringing the property from 20% to <br />23% total structural coverage. <br />HARDSHIP <br />It isn ’t out of the ordinary for staictural coverage variances to be granted for commercial <br />properties. In fact, variances in the past have been granted to allow for up to 20% or 30% <br />for commercial properties. For example, the Service 800 building on Highway 12 had a <br />structural coverage variance to allow 26.1%. The Zoning Ordinance doesn ’t allow for <br />any exceptions for commercial properties however, commercial properties are not seen as <br />critical as residential properties with relation to the 15% maximum. This requirement is a <br />density issue and commercial properties are generally viewed as more dense, as their lot <br />area and setback requirements are less strict as residential properties. The reasonableness <br />of commercial properties having to meet this requirement, the impacts of the proposed <br />entrance, and the benefits and/or disadvantages of the entrance should be discussed in <br />determining whether a variance should be considered for this proposal.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.