My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-09-2004 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2004
>
08-09-2004 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2023 11:31:57 AM
Creation date
1/25/2023 11:23:22 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
195
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
.al- <br />OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />MONDAY, JULY 19,2004 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />submitted hardcover calculations reflect this deck portion. Mr. Sequira indicated that the hardcover <br />calculations do include this deck area, and referred to Exhibit E. for clarification. <br />There followed a discussion that clarified exactly what hardcover calculations had been approved in <br />1992 and what was included or excluded from the 2004 hardcover calculations. Chair Rahn <br />summarized that the rebuilding of the existing deck has no further encroachment into the 0*75’ <br />setback. <br />Chair Rahn asked for public comments. There were none. <br />Jurgens asked for further clarification of the proposed hardcover calculations, referring to Page 3 of <br />the June 15. 2004 Staff Report. Chair Rahn requested the record to indicate that the hardcover <br />calculation increa.se from 11.1% to 13.2% re.sults from the allowed path/access to the lake and not <br />from any additional deck hardcover. <br />Bremer moved, Kempf seconded, to recommend approval of Application ^04-3026, David <br />Pomije, 801 Tonkawa Road, granting after-the-fact lake setback and 0-75’ hardcover variances <br />in order to reconstruct (and reconfigure) a deck, consisting of the following: <br />a. Hardcover w ithin 0-75’ of 11% or 3,464.3 s.f. <br />b. Lake set back variance to allow a deck setback of 39’ where 75 ’ is required and 49’ <br />currently exists (house). <br />c. Bluff impact zone encroachment of 25 ’. <br />VOTE: Ayes 7, Nays 0. <br />NEW BUSINESS <br />6. #04-3029 MICHAEL KEAVENY, 3423/3425 SHORELINE DRIVE, COMMERCIAL SITE <br />PLAN REVIEW, PUBLIC HEARING (6:29-6:45 p.m.) <br />Michael Keaveny, applicant, was present. <br />.. \ <br />Page 6 of 18
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.