Laserfiche WebLink
F <br />MEMORANDUM <br />To: <br />From: <br />Date: <br />Subject: <br />Ron Moorse <br />Mike Gaffron, Planning Director <br />July 7, 2004 <br />W04-3024B Large Vehicle Storage Zoning Ameiulinent <br />On June 28 Council tabled tlic Large Vehicle Storage amendment to allow staff additional time to <br />investigate alternatives. <br />Under the City ordinances existing prior to December 2003, staffinterpreted the code to mean that one <br />large vehicle was allowed to be stored outside on a property with few restrictions. Under the cun cut code <br />adopted in December 2003, the ability to have a large vehicle stored on a property is not a guaranteed <br />right, nor is it an ‘existing use’ that can be "grandfathered” or recognized as a legal non-conforming use. <br />The new ordinance established performance standards for storage of large vehicles, and to date that <br />ordinance docs not contain any language that allows pre-ex isi ing storage situations to continue in a manner <br />that is not conforming. While ‘grandfathering’ provisions could be added to the code, staff is generally <br />against such an action because it requires inventoiying ;uid recordkeeping, and does not solve pre-existing <br />problem situations which the new perfomiance standards were attempting to resolve. <br />There may be a small variety of options for allowing large vehicles to be stt>red under coiulitions that tlo <br />not meet the cunently established |ki fonnance standaids. Each option has pro's and con ’s. These opti^ins <br />may include <br />1) revising the performance standards, or <br />2) granting of a variance to a performance standard where the Council finds that an “undue <br />hardship” is present; or <br />3) establishing large \ chicle storage .is a conditional use with required perfomiance standards; it <br />could be written such that the performance standards might be relaxed if the negative impacts <br />of such relaxation can be mitigated or are found to be minimal or inconsequential. <br />O To dale. Council has not revised the performance staiulards, as there has not been a majority of <br />Councihnembers who believe the code should he changed. <br />n With regards to variances, the Council may allow a property to be used in a manner otherwise <br />prohibited by the ordinance by varying one or more of the perfomiance stand:uds of the ordinance, <br />iftheCouiicildetenmiiestlut the test of ‘‘undiie hardship” has been met. The stauitorv definition of <br />Undue Hardship is: "Undue hardship"... means the property in question eannot be put to a <br />reasonable use if used under the eonditions alloteed by the official controls, the plight of the <br />\