My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-28-2004 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2004
>
06-28-2004 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2023 12:17:53 PM
Creation date
1/25/2023 10:31:39 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
347
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
2. <br />3. <br />4. <br />5. <br />The property is located in the LR - IB, One Family Lakeshore Residential <br />District, which requires a minimum lot area of one (1) acre. The <br />applicant’s property is 0.527 acres in area. <br />The Planning Commission reviewed this application at public hearings <br />held on January 20, 2004 and February 17, 2004 and recommended <br />approval of the hardcover and average lakeshore setback variances based <br />on the following findings: <br />a. The property is 0.527 acres in size where the zoning district requires 1 <br />acre. <br />b. The existing deck has rotted and is in need of repair. <br />c. The property contains 40.45% hardcover in the 75’-250 ’ zone where <br />25% is normally allowed and the applicant is proposing to reduce that <br />hardcover by 183 square feet. <br />d. The four (4) foot encroachment into the average lakeshore setback will <br />not obstruct any views to the lake as the neighbor to the north sits <br />much higher in elevation and the neighbor to the south doesn ’t have <br />any views over the applicant’s property to due changing topography. <br />The City Council has considered this application including the findings <br />and recommendation of the Planning Commission, repons by City staff, <br />comments by the applicants and the public, and the effect of the proposed <br />variances on the health, safety and welfare of the community. <br />The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property arc <br />peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning <br />district; that granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic <br />conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring <br />property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is <br />necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to <br />preserve a substantial property right of the applicants; and would be in <br />keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive <br />Plan of the City. <br />Page 2 of 6
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.