Laserfiche WebLink
«^04-2969 <br />June 21i 2004 <br />Page 1 of 2 <br />Date Application Received: 12-17-03 <br />Date Application Considered as Complete: 1-8-04 <br />60-Day Review Period Expires: 3-8-04 extended to 5-7-04 extended to 7-6-04 <br />To:Chair Mabusth and Planning Commission Members <br />Ron Moorse, City Administrator <br />From: Janice Gundlach, City Planner ^ <br />Date: <br />Subject: <br />June 15,2004 <br />04*2969, Terry & Gretchen Blount, 1390 Cherry Place <br />- Hardcover <br />- Public Hearing <br />Zoning District: <br />Lot Area: <br />Lot Width: <br />LR- IB, One Family Lakeshore Residential District (1 acre min.) <br />0.527 acres (22,957 s.f.) <br />100 feet <br />Application Summary: Applicant requests to amend the original deck replacement <br />variance approval, received in March, 2004, to include the following variances needed in <br />order to construct a covered entry in conjunction with a remodel project: <br />1. Hardcover variance to permit 39.25% hardcover in the 75’-250 ’ zone when 25% <br />is normally allowed and 39.25% currently exists and no change is requested. <br />2. Variance to allow the proposed covered entry to be located 4 ’ from of the existing <br />detached garage where a 10 ’ building-to-building setback is normally required. <br />Sta/f Recommendation: Staff recommends the variance approval for the deck be <br />amended to include the requested variances needed to allow the applicants to construct a <br />covered entry over the front stoop. <br />List of Exhibits <br />Exhibit A - Survey Showing Proposed Covered Entry & Previous Deck Approval <br />Exhibit B - 60-Day Review Period Extension Letters <br />Exhibit C - Prior Approved Resolution <br />Background <br />The applicant originally applied for variances in order to essentially rebuild a new <br />residence on the existing lot. The applicant then decided rather than constructing a new <br />home; a major renovation of the existing home would be conducted and the applicants <br />merely needed a variance to rebuild the existing deck. The applicants received a variance <br />for bedcover and average lakeshore setback for the deck in March of this year. The <br />applicants are also working on submittal of a conditional use permit request to replace the <br />existing railroad tic retaining wall, within 75’ of the lake, with a boulder outcrop. The <br />Plaiming Commission will review this request once an engineered plan h^ been <br />submitted. The applicants have since proceeded in the renovation of the existing home. <br />/