My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-28-2004 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2004
>
06-28-2004 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2023 12:17:53 PM
Creation date
1/25/2023 10:31:39 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
347
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />MONDAY, MAY 17, 2004 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />anticipates the perceived density of the clustered, compact layout of perhaps 2 units/acre with individual lots <br />that actually range in gross area from l.OS acres to 3.90 acres. <br />Gaffron advised the individual lots do not meet all lot size or setback requirements of the R-IB District. The <br />proposed 35’ front and 10’ side setbacks are typical of Orono’s I’acre zones. <br />Gaffron observed that the proposed site layout and lot standards makes more sense than prior submittals as it <br />no longer proposes long, narrow back lot necks with poor driveway patterns. Now it is a very clustered, <br />compact development. <br />Gaffron refened to the MnDNR comments in E.xhibit H. supporting the conservation area and expressing <br />reservations about i'.uividual lot's private access to the Luce Line trail. <br />Gaffron continued he review the significant Subdivision Review points addressed in the Staff Report, dated <br />May 14,2004, noting its highlights. Included are 7 Issues for Consideration to be addressed by the Plarmmg <br />Commission and providing direction to staff and the applicant. Gaffron indicated that any recommendation fc <br />approval should address the Issues for Consideration the staff recommendation, as found on Page S and 9 of <br />the Staff Report, May 14, 2004. <br />Henry Lazniarz, applicant, conveyed that there is now an easement agreement with the Mary Dunn for road <br />access to BroNvn Road. The agreement has been submitted to the Dunn’s. <br />Tom Goodrum, Schoell and Madson, planner for the applicant, c.xplaincd that in an effort to preserve the <br />property physical amenities and to create a residential enclave with clustering the homes, the house pads are <br />SO’ X 80’ and are expecting estate-style homes to built. Mr. Goodrum commented the layout features a massed <br />relationship and does not now force additional homes next to fne two back to bac'x ‘nomes on the south. He <br />expressed the plat layout was redesigned to accommodate the neighborhood and the Planning Commission's <br />concerns from earlier meetings. Trees loss will occur but is focused into one area with the clustering of the <br />home sites and are looking to plant boulevard trees and providing perimeter screening with trees looking both <br />inward and outward. He indicated the 18% slopes though not very long provide a natural setting for walkout <br />style houses. <br />Mr. Lazniarz added the road placement is proposed where the existing driveway is now to minimize site <br />disruption. <br />1 <br />J <br />Page 48 of 58
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.