Laserfiche WebLink
Tient over wetlands and creek, and <br />iment over the defined conservation <br />eptable to the City Attorney and City <br />rm of an outlot; this is not the normal <br />rms of being able to credit total area <br />d areas would be greater if they were <br />^04-3016 <br />June 9,2004 <br />Page 4 <br />Issues for Discussion <br />1. Does Council agree with the use of the PRD subdivision method for this property? <br />2. Should the areas to be preserved via conservation easements, be in an Outlot, or merely as <br />an easement within each individual property? <br />3. Does Council have any problems with a single Luce Line access to serve the neighborhood? <br />4. Does Council have any concerns about the proposed lot sizes, configurations and setbacks? <br />5. Has the applicant satisfactorily resolved the access issue? <br />6. Any other issues or concerns? <br />ommended that no public dedication for <br />lication Fee should be required. Park <br />iccess trail to the Luce Line should be <br />y rding the method of dedication of open <br />the boundaries of the property, creating <br />ership. This is how Orono has commonly <br />vever, in PRD's such as Painter ’s Creek <br />low View (2000, west of Willow Dnve <br />ice have more typically been established <br />its or covenants that provide permanent <br />affect the individual homeowner and the <br />ssociation may be perceived by individual <br />accur, and such land is probably ‘policed ’ <br />ly property ’, there is a reduced risk of an <br />accessory buildings, fences, or other uses. <br />)d 0 f nei ghborhood recreational use o f the <br />cly monitored by the individual landowner, <br />■espass, whereas the common outlot gives <br />rea to use’. <br />Staff RecommeDdatton <br />Staff recommends approval of the proposed subdivision as a PRD, subject to the following general or <br />specific conditions: <br />1. Acceptance of the proposed 7-lot plat on 14.0 dry buildable acres and acceptance of the <br />proposed lot sizes, configurations and setbacks; except that the areas shown on the preliminary plat <br />drawing as “Proposed Conservation Easements ’’ shall be platted as an Open Space Outlot for <br />ownership by a homeowners association. Rear setbacks shall be re-established for the affected <br />individual lots and depicted on a revised preliminary plat drawing to be provided by the applicant. <br />2. Applicant shall submit for Council review and acceptance a draft “Conservation Easement ’’ <br />specifying the proposed conditions and limitations to be placed on the Open Space Outlot. Such <br />easement may include provisions for the existing wood creek crossing bridge to remain on the <br />property and address potential liability issues for use, maintenance or replacement of such bridge. <br />Such casement may include provisions for the construction of a private trail with no more than one <br />(1) connecting point to the Luce Line Trail, subject to approval of the MnDNR. <br />3. All areas shown as wetlands on the preliminary plat drawing shall be subject to the standard <br />Flowage and Conservation Easement. <br />4. The PRD is subject to the standard Park Dedication Fee requirement. <br />5. Approval is subject to the standard Storm Water and Drainage Trunk Fee. <br />ed as im outlot, per the sketch attached. <br />J <br />J