06-28-2004 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

#04-3016 Jun« 9,2004 Pite2 Please review the memo and exhibits ofMay 14, and die Planning Commission draft minutes of May 21. Planning Commission Recommendation Planning Commission recommended approval of the proposed subdivision on a vote of 5-2, based on the following findings or subject to these recommended conditions: 1. Planning Commission finds that the Planned Residential Development (PRD) subdivision approach is appropriate for this property based on the various environmental factors present including steep topography, creek, wetlands, etc. 2. Planning Commission accepts the proposed 7-lot plat on 14.0 dry buildable acres and accepts the proposed lot sizes, configurations and setbacks. Planning Commission concludes that the slopes of greater than 18% in the area to be developed are of relatively short length and they should not be excluded from allowed land alteration nor should they reduce the acreage of the developable area. 3. The areas to be preserved via conservation easements or similar open space dedications may be in the form of easements covering multiple individual properties rather than within one or more platted outlots. (***Scc staff discussion below***) 4. No formal or joint access to the Luce Line should be provided; any individual access points should be infomial. 5. Approval is subject to the standard Park Dedication Fee, subject to recommendation of the Park Commission. 6. Approval is subject to the standard Storm Water and Drainage Tmnk Fee. 7. Approval is subject to provision of the standard Road, Drainage and Utility Easements to be granted over the new road outlot as well as over the 40’ easement access to Brown Road. (Note: Staff has been advised by City Attorney Tom Barrett he is discussing the 10' Kailestad Acres easement with Mr. McCuskey, and / have been advised by Mr. V'an Eeckhout that an appeal wilt be filed regarding the latest ruling on the 40' easement). 8. Road to be 28' paved width, not 24 . i 9. Subject to recommendations of Cit> Engineer as noted in his comments dated 5-7-04, except that the 40' access corridor need not be platted as long as it is covered via the required easements.