Laserfiche WebLink
fo - <br />ft* <br />^3^esho^ <br />CITY of 0R0\"0 <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. _3^S <br />A.Major upgrading of the property will result in the <br />following changes to existing substandard <br />conditions; <br />Lakeshore setback; <br />Required = 75' <br />Existing Principal Structure =» <br />Existing Accessory Structure = <br />Proposed Principal Structure = <br />Proposed Accessory Structure <br />level deck extends 2' beyond lakefront <br />of principal residence) <br />55' <br />10' <br />61* <br />(second <br />Variance; <br />Existing Principal Structure =20* or 26% <br />Proposed Principal Structure =14' or 18.6% <br />Existing Accessory Structure = 65' or 86% <br />Proposed Accessory Structure = 16' <br />(second story upper level deck) <br />or 21% <br />Hardcover within the 0-75' setback area: <br />Allowed = 0 s.f. <br />Existing - 926 s.f. or 15.8% <br />Proposed - 812 s.f. or 13.5% <br />Total Reduction =» 2.5% <br />B.The application involves no need for a hardcover <br />variance within the 75-250' setback area as <br />applicant proposes removal of major portions of <br />existing hardcover within the 75-250' setback <br />area. <br />C.The use of the existing foundation will provide <br />less of an impact on the lakeshore property. <br />D.The original structure was placed on the property <br />prior to current standards for lakeshore <br />development. <br />4.Tne City Council has considered this application <br />including the findings and recommendations of the <br />Plannxng Commission^ reports by City stafff comments by <br />the applicant and the effecu of the proposed variances <br />on the healthr safety and welfare of the community. <br />Page 2 of 5