My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-28-2004 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
06-28-2004 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2023 12:17:53 PM
Creation date
1/25/2023 10:31:39 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
347
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, June 14, 2004 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />(#04-2974 RELIANCE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLP, NW QUADRANT HWY 12 <br />(OUTLOT A, STONEBAY) - COMMERCIAL PUD SITE PLAN REVIEW, GENER.\L <br />CONCEPT PLAN APPROVAL, PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL, CMP AMENDMENT <br />APPROVAL - RESOLUTIONS NO. 5188,5189, AND 5190 continued) <br />Curtis provided the sample of building exterior design colors for the two smaller retail buildings. <br />Gaffron stated Walgreens would have the same brick but not the blue canopy color. Van Dell <br />pointed out the colors of each building design feature. <br />.Mayor Peterson and White objected to the blue color for the canopies. <br />White asked if there could be parking spaces removed on the side of the smaller building to try to <br />address McMillan’s traffic concerns. Gaffron commented there is no entrance on that building side. <br />Trautz replied that if the parking spaces were removed, Walgreens would pull out of the development <br />because with rotating of the Walgreens building, Walgreens ended up losing front door parking <br />spaces and is anticipating their customers will use the parking spaces on the northeast side of the <br />smaller building. Traut/ emphasized they do not foresee traffic volume problems. Van Dell pointed <br />out there would be a 24’ drive aisle plus 20’ widths for parking stalls. Sansevere remarked that most <br />patrons would likely park elsewhere due to walking distances and therefore there would not be too <br />many parking stalls impacted by any potential problems of vehicles backing into cross traffic. <br />Murphy moved, Sansevere seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5188, a Resolution <br />approving the General C'onccpt Plan for property located in Outlut A, Stunebay, subject to City <br />Attorney review of the letter from the applicant's attorney, Michael A. Putnam, dated June 11, <br />2004. VOTE: AvesS, NavsO. <br />Murphy moved. White seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5189, a Resolution approving <br />the Preliminary Plat for property located in Outlot A, Stonebay, subject to City .Attorney <br />review of the letter from the applicant's attorney, Michael A. Putnam, dated June II, 2004. <br />VO TE: Ayes 4, Nays I <br />Murphy moved. Mayor Peterson seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION No. 5190, a Resolution <br />approving Amendment #2 of the 2000-2020 City of Orono Community Management Plan <br />regarding Outlot A, Stonebay, subject to City Attorney review of the letter from the applicant's <br />attorney, Michael .A. Putnam, dated June 11,2004. \'O rK: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />Gaffron advised the following documents would be scheduled for City Council action on June 28. <br />2004: <br />a. General Development Plan Approval Resolution <br />b. Final Plat Approval Resolution <br />c. Rezoning Ordinance for PUD 4A <br />Dunbar, applicant’s representative, confirmed there would be no blue colored canopies on any of the <br />proposed buildings. Instead he proposed a green. By consensus the Council accepted a darker shade <br />of green as an alternate to the proposed blue color. <br />Pace 7 of 22
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.