My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-14-2004 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2004
>
06-14-2004 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2023 11:14:59 AM
Creation date
1/25/2023 8:56:22 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
627
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1. <br />2. <br />3. <br />u <br />FLNDINGS <br />This application was reviewed as Zoning File #04-3012. <br />The properly is located in the LR-IA, Single Family Lakeshore <br />Residential District, which requires a minimum lot area of 2 acres and <br />minimum lot width of 200’. The area of the property is 3.3 acres (144,491 <br />s.f.) and defined lot width is 650’+. <br />The Planning Commission reviewed this application at a public hearing <br />held on May 17, 2004 and recommended approval of conditional use <br />permits and a variance for chimney heights in excess of 30’; grading, fill <br />and a retaining wall located within the flood fhnge based on the following <br />flndings: <br />a.The applicant will conduct grading and filling below 931.5 MSL <br />within the flood fringe, consisting of construction of a retaining wall, <br />excavation and mitigation as depicted on Exhibit B approved by the <br />City Engineer. <br />b. The applicant will comply with the recommendations of the City <br />Engineer and the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Rule C permit <br /># 04-210 regarding floodplain filling and mitigation. <br />c. The applicant will comply with Municipal Zoning Code Section 78- <br />1117, standards for floodway and flood fringe conditional uses. <br />d. The chimneys at a height of 40’ 8 ” will have no negative visual <br />impacts within the neighborhood and as an architectural feature will <br />not be out of character within the neighborhood. <br />The Plarming Commission reviewed the application at a public hearing <br />held on May 17, 2004 and recommended denial of the request for a <br />hardcover variance within 75’ of the OHWL and denial of the fence <br />request within 75’ of the OHWL based on the following findings: <br />a. The applicant’s request for a hardcover variance within the 0-75’ <br />setback for construction f a wooden boardwalk and deck all on level <br />ground should be denied as there is no hardship to support the <br />variance. <br />Page 2 of 6
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.