Laserfiche WebLink
John C. Traulz <br />Jane 11,2004 <br />Page 4 <br />3. In resolution Section 2, Code Section 78-1010, subd 10(c)(1)(A), an <br />additional permitted use should be added: <br />‘29. Ollier non-food retail uses.’ <br />C. Resolution Aoprovina General Concept Plan. <br />1. The name “Reliance Development Company, L.L.P.” should be changed <br />throughout the resolution to “Stonebay Commercial LLC.” <br />2. In the portion of the resolution entitled “Conclusions. Order and <br />Conditions,” the first sentence of section 1 should be revised to read: "The City of Orono <br />will approve rezoning of tlie properly to PUD/BO as described herein, provided such <br />rezoning shall subject the properly to the Condition.s for Development set forth lierein “ <br />3. In Section 2.A.4 of the portion of the resolution entitled “Conclusions, <br />Order and Conditions,” the words “maximized to the greatest extent possible but in no <br />case shall be” must be replaced with “not.” The standard as currently written is too high <br />and vague. <br />4. In Section 2.A.7 of the portion of tlie resolution entitled "Conclusions, <br />Order and Conditions,” the words “ the words “where adjacent to the Property ” should be <br />inserted after “Kelley Parkway.” 1 expect this is what is intended, but it shouUI be made <br />clear so that your obligation in this regard is not expanded to more of Kelley Parkway ’s <br />boulevard. <br />5. In the first sentence of Section 2.A.9 of the portion of the resolution <br />entitled “Conchisirtns, Order and Conditions,” the words “and shall be approved by the <br />City Council" should be deleted. As 1 understand it, they are approving your lighting <br />plan, and no additional approval should be necessary. <br />6. In Section 2. A. 10(a) of the portion of the resolution entitled “Conclusions, <br />Order and Conditions,” a subsection 5 should be added as follows: “A free-standing men <br />sign in comicction witli any approved drive-thru use.” This t\pe of structure will be <br />necessary in the event of an approved drive-thru, and while it could arguably be included <br />under one of the otlicr categories, it should be made clear. <br />SWO)