Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />MONDAY, MAY 17, 2004 <br />6:00 o’clock p.tn. <br />Chair Mabusth summarized that the two retail buildings will have different exteriors than Waif eens. <br />Mr. Spina agreed somewhat, clarifying they will look different enough but not identical so it would not look <br />like one big broad development. <br />Kcmpf asked where the blue color would be used. <br />Mr. Spina tried to explain where the blue would be used and pointed out areas on the building elevation where <br />the awnings are above the windows and doors. <br />Rahn asked for information about if the brick extends up to the gables. <br />Mr. Spina showed on the building elevation where masonry or brick will be used, pointing out the blue awning <br />above the glass, clarifying roof and fascia colors, too. <br />Chair Mabusth provided a copy of the Metropolitan Council letter, dated May 14, 2004. regarding the <br />Comprehensive Plan Amendment for Stonebay Outlot A - Waiver of further review to the applicant. <br />Chair Mabusth asked for additional Planning Commission comments concerning the exterior. She asked for <br />their opinions if it docs meet the established critena. <br />Rahn and Kempf concurred that it docs meet the established criteria. <br />Mr. Trautz referred to the issue of whether building-mounted lighting is proposed. He stated it is intended to <br />have building-mounted lighting but had not provided the City with any samples. <br />Mr. Spina interjected that it wm generically described in the submitted drawings/clcvations. It will be more a <br />decorative lighting, it wall be completely cut-off and shielded with no projection of horizontal hght. <br />Chair Mabusth asked the applicant if they heard Gaffron’s comments concerning the type of lighting proposed <br />for the light poles as not being wrarm and residential as in the rest of the Stonebay L .• velopment <br />Pa^e 14 of 58