Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, March 15,2004 <br />6:00 o ’clock p.m. <br />(ftU. //04-2997 CITY OF ORONO, BIG ISLAND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, <br />VARIANCES-Continucd) <br />formerly used on the north side of the wetland. That access was on private property, and the <br />owner recently converted it to lawn area The City has long held that the City has an obligation <br />to provide reasonable access to the interior roads on the island for the occasional service vehicle, <br />and for the needs of the few inland properties that do not abut the lakeshorc. <br />The driveway will constitute filling of 25 cubic yards of giavel in the 0-75' zone, requiring a <br />CUP, and will constitute approximately 750 s.f. or 12% iinpcivious surface in the o-75 ‘ zone. <br />These impacts are unavoidable in order to provide suitable access, and have been minimized by <br />limiting the width of the driveway to 10'. <br />With passage of the WCA, the Mimichaha Creek Watershed District was designated by the City <br />as the responsible Local Government Unit (LGU) for administenng the WCA regulations. These <br />regulations provide degrees of flexibility for certain tyjics of wetland alteration activities, which <br />arc seen as positive rather than detrimental, and they provide for mitigation of negative impacts <br />when they are unavoidable. <br />The appropriate applications arc being made to the MCWD. MCWD approval shall be required <br />before the project may conuncncc. <br />Gaffron noted that this application w-as prepared by Public Services Director Greg Gappa with <br />the assistance of Jolin Smyth, Water Resource Specialist with Boncstroo & Associates, the City’s <br />engineering and environmental consultants. <br />Because wetland alterations are not allowed by Oroiio Code except by vanance, the activity is <br />required to be justified via the demonstration of a haidsliip. The commission was asked to review <br />the hardship statements within the application packet. The need for access to inland properties is <br />a valid hardship that supports tliis variance request, llie locations of the few access points to the <br />island were platted a century ago, before motorized vehicles were common. Ihc access points <br />generally were platted at low points in the topography, for obvious reasons. This is one of the <br />only potential acce.ss points for the north half of the island, and the proposed work is necessary <br />from a public a safety standpoint, as well as to provide access to inland lot owners. Access <br />caiuiot be provided without work in the 0-75' zone. <br />Gaffron stated that staff recommends approval of the variances and CUP to allow the wetland <br />alteration and driveway construction project, including filling of a portion of the wetland, <br />excavation within 26’ of the wetland, and filling and hardcover within the 0-75’ setback zone per <br />the revised plan, subject to establisluncnt of a Conservation and Flowagc Easement over the <br />wetland, and subject to MCWD pemiit approvals prior to commencement of construction <br />activities. <br />Page 41 of 48