Laserfiche WebLink
* <br />1^04.3000 <br />April 19.2004 <br />Page 3 of 3 <br />Structural Coverage p ->o i /i <br />This property is not subject to structural coverage requirements per Section 78-1403 as <br />the property is in excess of 1.99 acres. <br />Hardcover Calculations j • i. i. <br />This property is also not subject to hardcover requirements as it is not located within the <br />Shoreland Overlay District. <br />Conditional Use Permit Analysis <br />Because additions to the existing building are proposed, the existing conditional use <br />permit must be amended to reflect those changes. During the conditional use permit <br />process the site is reviewed to ensure the additions meet setbacks, structural coverage and <br />hardcover as well as parking requirements. <br />This site is unique in that the existing building exists on two parcels, one in Orono and <br />one in Wayzata. When the outer perimeter boundaries of all the parcels arc considered <br />for setback purposes, the addition is well within setback. Also, because of the acreage of <br />the propert'/ and because of its location relative to the Shoreland Overlay District, the site <br />isn’t subject to those requirements. And lastly, because the site is club member only, <br />parking v on’t need to increase with the square footage of the building. The existing <br />parking is within the required setbacks and exists almost entirely within the Wayzata City <br />limits. <br />Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control <br />The City Engineer has reviewed the plans received thus far and has determined there are <br />no major issues relative to reviewing the site plan. A more detailed engineering review <br />will be conducted at the time of building permit where erosion control measures will be <br />required. The City ’s biggest concern when grading is conducted on the property is that <br />the property maintains its own drainage. Because the area that grading is proposed is so <br />minimal when compared to the total area of the site, and because no other property owner <br />will be affected by the proposed grading, staff and the City Engineer had found the plans <br />submitted to be sufficient. <br />Building Design <br />The materials and fa9ade design proposed will match that of the existing structuie. The <br />Zoning Ordinance doesn ’t specifically note materials required for conditional uses in <br />residential zoning districts. Thus, Planning Department staff finds the proposed oxlerior <br />elevations adequate. <br />Issues for Consideration <br />1. Is the Planning Commission satisfied viith the level of detail provided? <br />2. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? <br />Staff Recommendation <br />Approval of the plans as submitted, which consists of approval of a conditional use <br />permit amendment and commercial site plan review. <br />i I >i I ,t I ! 5 <br />V f. <br />34 <br />i 5 <br />U s il t ti'-Sl■SI <br />.........