My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-26-2004 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2004
>
04-26-2004 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2023 8:55:25 AM
Creation date
1/19/2023 4:08:06 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
447
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINTITES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Tuesday, January 20,2004 <br />6:00 o’clock p.tn. <br />(MIKE KEAVENY ON BEHALF OF RICHARD M. KEAVENY REV. TRUST, 342S <br />SHORELINE DRIVE, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND COMMERCIAL SITE <br />PLAN REVIEW - Continued) <br />Austin Evans, 2497 Kelly Avenue, the nearest neighbor to the south of the bowling alley, <br />voiced numerous concerns: <br />1) As Kelly Avenue is a residential street, he found the additional traffic <br />worrisome within a residential neighborhood. <br />2) The fact that the restaurant and lounge would have a liquor license was a <br />concern, especially since the neighborhood is kept up at night from the commotion at the <br />Narrows currently. <br />3) He questioned whether there was adequate space for restaurant use and the <br />parking to accompany it. <br />4) The City carmot ensure how long the Pizza Factory will remain, and the <br />City would lose control of what type of restaurant or lounge occupies this space in the <br />future by allowing this today to go forward. <br />5) The traffic exiting onto County Road 15 would make a dangerous situation <br />and intersection worse. <br />6) Evans cautioned that re-location of the bus shelter at the junction of Kelly <br />Avenue and County Road 15 would be far more dangerous than where it is cunently. <br />Encouraging pedestrians to cross 2-4 lanes of traffic between cars stacked up for the light <br />would be hazardous. <br />7) ^^f■hat would the impact be to Lake Minnetonka from this additional <br />development merely 200 ’ from the lake. Might people try to snowmobile or obtain boat <br />access to the restaurant. <br />8) 68% of the little proposed landscaping at all is located primarily in the rear <br />where few see it. In fact, no landscape plan has been provided. Reminded of the Navarre <br />Town Meeting a year ago, during which residents asked for additional landscaping along <br />County Road 15 in Navane. <br />9) The proposed parking facilities are incomplete and inadequate. While 53 <br />spaces are required, contrary to zoning regulations, the proposal offers a mere 30 spaces <br />for a 75 seat restaurant. The additional xrse requires 91 total spaces, short 7 in the proposal, <br />with no setbacks or grcenspace provided. <br />10) This approval would increase the use of the lot to 16,000 s.f. of retail space, <br />which required by zoning should assume 1 ’ of lot area per 4’ of retail space. Evans <br />maintained that by approving this request the City will continue to perpetuate an <br />unacceptable planning state of affairs for Navarre. <br />11) In the Navarre Town Meeting several points were echoed by the residents. <br />Since Navarre is considered Orono’s town center, why not make it more like Wa>'zata or <br />Excelsior with additional landscaping, street lighting, and updating facades of the <br />businesses in the area. <br />Evans encouraged the Planning Commission to give serious consideration to denial of this <br />applicant’s request and recommend the owner address alternative uses for the site. He <br />PAGE 46 of 53 <br />L
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.