04-26-2004 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

k f M MI * MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Tuesday, January 20, 2004 6:00 o’clock p.m. (MIKE KEAVENY ON BEHALF OF RICHARD M. KEAVENY REV. TRUST, 3425 SHORELINE DRIVE, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND COMMERCIAL SITE PLAN REVIEW - Continued) the upper parking area to the bowling alley and restaurant. The City Engineer found no causes for concern with this plan, however, the applicant will be subject to any building code requirements at the time of building permit with respect to the staircase and proposed walls. Gundlach noted that staff finds this connection * ■ be aesthetically pleasing and a functional connection for the upper gravel lot to the lower parking lot, bowling alley, and restaurant entrances. Gundlach reported that the subject property is allowed 529 s.f. of signage, based on City Code standards, Section 78-1468. Additionally, no individual sign may exceed 50 s.f. The applicants proposed signage meets all the city code requirements. While the applicant has not provided a landscape plan, Gundlach pointed out that there are three potential areas for lan^caping: 1) The area between the 2-tier retaining wall system separating the upper gravel parking lot from the lower parking lot 2) The planter boxes proposed at the top of the proposed stairway system, and, 3) The planter box proposed for the signage at the northeast comer of the lot. She recommended the Planning Commission discuss requiring implementation of some type of landscaping in these three areas in an effort to provide additional green space on the property. Additionally, as noted previously, the provision of 20710’ green space yards along Shoreline Drive and Kelly Avenue should be considered for the gravel lot. This area has been functionally a “no-man’s land” and overflow parking for many years, and its formalization as a parking facility should trigger establishment of green space that, approaches City Code Standards. With regard to lighting, Gundlach stated that the applicant has provided a written description of the proposed lighting. The lighting for the current lower parking lot seems adequate, although it may need some repair, which the applicant has proposed to do. Staff would not recommend any further lighting in this area as the lot abuts residentially zoned property. In addition, the City’s Public Services Director has requested that a 100 s.f. casement be granted to the city to allow the current bus shelter near D’Vinci’s restaurant to be relocated to the northeast comer of the applicant’s site. A 10’ x 10’ easement in the northeast comer of the site is proposed. While the City Council has authorized re-location of the shelter, Gundlach suggested the Planning Commission determine whether this should be included with approval of the commercial site plan review, and how this will impact the applicant’s signage or parking plan. While the Zoning Ordinance doesn’t specifically outline conditions which the proposed PAGE 43 of 53 •'.F-W % I im wmiaiMiiwMiiai