My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-26-2004 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2004
>
04-26-2004 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2023 8:55:25 AM
Creation date
1/19/2023 4:08:06 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
447
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />MONDAY, APRIL 19, 2004 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />or not (as this is a City Council matter) but rather what particular issues are appropriate and how the <br />site if affected if liquor is served or not. <br />She referred to the January 20,2004 Planning Commission minutes and March 22, 2004 City Council <br />Minutes were attached to the staff report for reference. Gundlach stated staff s opinion is that the <br />City Council will not approve a liquor license for a restaurant regardless who applies for it due to <br />proximity to a residential neighborhood to the south. <br />Gundlach recommended denial of the CUP request and associated commercial site plan with <br />variances primarily based on two factors: 1) City Council will not approve a liquor license for a <br />restaurant on the site as it is too clo.se to a residential neighborhood, 2) operation of a Class II <br />restaurant on the site may not be able to handle the additional levels of noise, traffic and activity. <br />However, she stated it was vitally important to discuss what uses will be appropriate for this site <br />taking into consideration the exiting lay-out and adjacent residential neighborhood. Several variance <br />approvals are inevitable because of the existing non-conforming conditions She referred to the B-1 , <br />Retail Sales Business District standards attached to the staff report that will aid in the discussion. <br />Gundlach noted the existing townhouse development to the south was an allowed use due to the <br />location and its proximity to the business district. <br />In conclusion, Gundlach recommended the Planning Commission discuss the items highlighted on <br />the staff report as well as the Issues for Consideration section. Also, she notes the neighborhood <br />comments received by the City were in the Planning Commission agenda packet and represented in <br />Page 3 of 11
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.