Laserfiche WebLink
MiNUi£dcir liuc <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, March 8, 2004 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />the OHVV'L, and a aide setback variance, in order to reconstruct their deck no closer to the <br />side yard than the existing deck (2.5’ where 10 ’ is required). VOTE; Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />5. M3.2962 ROBERT AND JOAN SWITZ, 1740 SHADYWOOD ROAD - VARIANCE - <br />RESOLUTION NO. <br />Gundlach reported that the applicants had requested a lot area variance to allow a rebuild on a lot <br />which is .47 acres in size when .50 acres is required and a hardcover variance to allow 38.6% <br />hardcover in the 75-250* zone when 38.8% currently exists and 25% is normally allowed (also <br />removing 2,050 s.f. of hardcover from the 0-75* zone). <br />Gundlach explained that this application was heard at the Council meeting of Febmary 9, 2004, <br />during which the i^)plicants were directed to further reduce hardcover to 33%, or an additional 800 <br />s.f.. The applicants have chosen not to reduce hardcover any further than 38.6% and request <br />approval of the plan presented at the Feb. 9"* meeting. <br />Mayor Peterson indicated that the revisited the property since February O"* and watched the traffic <br />flow along County Road 19. After this examination, she felt there was legitimate hardship to justify <br />and support the applicants request to warrant the 38.6% hardcover presented in their proposal to <br />allow for adequate driveway and turn around apron. <br />Sansevere questioned whether there was quantiflable hardship to justify the hardcover request. <br />Gaffron explained that, within the paA five years, the City Council has said that total rebuilds must <br />meet a higher standard than remodels. Rebuilds have been consistently held to 25% hardcover, or <br />close to it, which has caused many applicants to significantly change their plans to meet this <br />requirement. Gaffron noted that the hardcover variance, in this application, is related to the size of <br />the home and driveway required to safely access the busy road. In recent years, he pointed out that <br />the Plaiming Commission has attempted to quantify hardship based on limits imposed by the shape <br />of a lot. Having taken the lot shape and location into consideration, staff still believes 33% <br />hardcover is appropriate for this situation. He maintained that by varying from this position, the <br />City Council would be inconsistent with what it has ruled in the past and could be setting precedent <br />PAGE 5 of 23 <br />•'A- f <br />1