Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, March 8,2004 <br />7:00 o ’clock p.m. <br />White moved to adopt Resolution No. 5129 including option #2, approving the plumbing in <br />accessory building CUP and requiring removal of all kitchen facilities, allowing the kitchen <br />sink to remain merely as a basin, not as a source of water, by removing its supportive <br />plumbing, and requiring standard covenant execution be put into place. <br />Mayor Peterson stated that she remembered the 1990 application which made the CUP approval <br />subject to combination. <br />Pierpont questioned why his property could not be ‘grandfathered’ to allow the guest house. He <br />stated that he has an enormous 4 acre plus 2 acre parcel, which has been discounted by a 4/10 of an <br />acre wetland. He indicated that he was offended and believed the City was wrong to disadvanuge <br />him the use of his guest house. <br />While Sansevere was cmpathetic that the kitchen did not fit his definition of a useful facility, he <br />stated that the Code leaves the Council few options. <br />Sansevere seconded. VOTE: Ayes 3, Nays 2, Murphy and Mayor Peterson dissenting. <br />12. #04-2984 MCCARTHY CONSTRUCTION ON BEHALF OF BERKSHIRE <br />PROPERTIES, 2745 KELLY PARKWAY - PI D/CO.MMERCIAL SITE PLAN REVIEW <br />Gundlach explained that the applicant requests a conunercial site plan review in order to obtain a <br />building permit to construct a 36,000 s.f. medical office building. She pointed out that the increased <br />setback from Highway 12 was due to the height of the two story building. Gundlach stated that, <br />while the 159 proposed parking stalls is 3 short of the required 162, the applicants have provided 3 <br />proof of parking stalls within their plan. She noted that the Planning Commission voted 5-0 <br />appro', al of the plans as submitted with incorporation of the following staff recommendations and <br />approval from the fire marshal: <br />1. Submittal of the shared parking and access arrangement documents prior to the City <br />council review. <br />2. A revised landscape plan shall be submitted pnor to the City Council renew which <br />incorporates the comments contained in the staff report. <br />Gundlach indicated that staff would recommend approval of the commercial site plan review <br />incorporating the Fire Marshall’s comments, landscape plan, and would further suggest the Council <br />direct staff to execute a PUD/dcveloper ’s agreement for approval at the next scheduled meeting. <br />Sansevere moved, .Murphy seconded, to direct staff to draft a PUD/developer*s agreement for <br />approval at the next scheduled meeting. <br />McMillan questioned lighting of the sidewalk and trail. <br />Gundlach stated that the applicant would be responsible fo. s trail along Kelley ParkwTjy. <br />GaHron pointed out that development is getting close to the point where construction of lh‘ <br />blacktoppcd sidewalk along Highway 12 will be in order. <br />PAGE 11 of 16