My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-22-2004 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
03-22-2004 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2023 8:54:44 AM
Creation date
1/19/2023 3:25:48 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
390
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, March 8,2004 <br />7:00 o ’clock p.m. <br />Gaffron stated that the best that staff ever offers applicants is to present 15% structural cover and <br />ask for a minimal driveway to accommodate it. He encouraged the Council to consider <br />recommending new standards for driveway and parking, when safety is a key factor, as well as, the <br />magnitude of removals in the 0-75’. <br />Mayor Peterson disagreed with Sansevere that the City would be, in essence, granting 'bonus <br />points ’ for removals. She stated that she had based her recommendation on safety and the fact that <br />this will be a far better situation than what is there currently. She urged staff to craft a resolution <br />that would not be seen as precedent setting and one that hits on the Council's key points in this <br />case. <br />Sansevere asked if the resolution could be crafted to justify a hardship. <br />Gaffron maintained that, once quantified, staff could support 15% structural cover and safe <br />driveway access, however, he questioned whether the City might be opening itself up to people <br />returning from past applications to ask for more. <br />McMillan suggested that the City give consideration to increasing hardcover from 25% to 30%, if <br />the reality is that the City is continually bombarded by hardcover variance requests. <br />Gaflron noted that if the City wishes to give credence to removals within the 0-75’ zone, there may <br />be justification for upping the coverage within the 75-250’ zone. <br />Murphy .'knowledgcd that, in this case, the applicants can’t be expected to safely back out onto <br />County Road 19. <br />Mayor Peterson moved. White seconded, to grant a lot area and hardcover variance for 1740 <br />Shadywood Road per the Planning Commission recommendation, directing staff to revise the <br />resolution to reflect the concepts of discussion amongst the Council this evening. VOTE: Ayes <br />3, Nays 2, Sansevere and McMillan dissenting. <br />*6. #03-2964 BRLCE AND KRIS PADDOCK, 3250 FOX STREET, EAW PETITION - <br />RESOLUTION NO. 5125 <br />Murphy moved. White seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5125 flndin^;' that the Maxwell <br />Bay Estates subdivision will have no potential for significant environmental effects, and <br />determining that an EAW will not be required. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />*7. #04-2968 CUSTOM STRUCTURES LTD., 440 STUBBS BAY ROAD NORTH - LOT <br />LINE REARRANGEMENT - RESOLUTION NO. 5126
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.