My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-22-2004 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2004
>
03-22-2004 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2023 8:54:44 AM
Creation date
1/19/2023 3:25:48 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
390
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
2765 Kelley Parkway - Siga <br />March 18,2004 <br />Page! <br />f ^ <br />Sumrairv <br />November 2002 Approval <br />Monument: 13’4 ” wide x 12* high = 160 s.f. per side <br />Sign Face: 8’ wide x 8*6*’ high = 68 s.f. per face <br />June 2003 Building Permit Staff Approval <br />Monument: 13’ wide x 12*8 ” high » 165 s.f. per side <br />Sign Face: 8’ wide x 8*6” high = 68 s.f. per face <br />2004 Sign Permit Application <br />Monument: 13’ wide x I3’8” high » 178 s.f. per side <br />Sign Face: 7.125 ’ wide x 10’ high - 71 s.f. per face <br />Staff Recommendation <br />The height of the sign is an issue because it sets the tone for all other signage along Kelley Parkway. <br />Monument signs are by design intended to be low to the ground, as opposed to pylon signs which are <br />by nature raised to a height for greater visibility. A monument at 12’ or 12’8” is already pushing the <br />limit, in staffs opinion, especially for an office use. If this was retail, there would be a greater need <br />for highly visible signage. <br />The Development Agreenient provides that minor amendments to the approved plan may be referred <br />to the Development Review Committee, which consists of the Plaiming Director, Public Services <br />Director and the City Planner. <br />COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED <br />Options for Action <br />1. Indicate to the applicant that the sign may not exceed the 12’8” height improved with the <br />building permit. <br />2. Refer this to the Development Review Committee for fuud action. <br />3. Refer this to Development Review Committee for a recommendation, with Council to take <br />final action. <br />4. Advise applicant to make a formal request for PUD amendment, for Planning Commission <br />and Council review. <br />5. Conclude that the sign dimensions as proposed on the sign permit tqiplication are acceptable.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.