Laserfiche WebLink
than to fctura to County Road IS. The conununity expressed their traffic concerns at the <br />Orono Navarre Town Meeting held on March 13,2003 where 11 statements were made <br />about the danger from current traffic volume. This use will only increase traffic coming <br />from other parts of the Twin City Area and contribute to an even greater danger to the <br />safety of the public. <br />3. PUBLIC WELFARE <br />The location and use will be very detrimental to public welfare in seven ways. In the first <br />instance it will only increase run off water into Lake Minnetonka fimn the expanded car <br />park. While the iqiper car park is technically “hardcover^ at present, the hardtopping of it <br />is bound to increase the run off water into Lake Minnetonka. I am astounded that a <br />commercial site such as this within 200 feet of a Lake Miimetonka lagoon is permitted to <br />have a 90% hardcover whereas the city stringently enforces the hardcover regulations in <br />respect of residential property. Why do we have to perpetuate and compound an already <br />sorry state of affairs? Serondly Navarre has one liquor bar and restaurant at present (The <br />Narrows) which is almost opposite this site. Two sudi establishments so near to each <br />other are not in the best interests of the public welfare. Neighbon are constantly <br />grumbling and complaining about the noise element from the existing establishment. <br />More importantly is there a need for another one? Thirdly a second establishment <br />consistinig of a bowling alley will attract an element of patronage which will be <br />irresponsible and rowdy. When the bowling alley was in operation, then every spring 1 <br />would have to collect empty beer cans, bottles and other g^age v^diich regularly filled a <br />garbage container; items thrown over my fence by customers of the bowling alley. How <br />much worse will diis be Mdien because of a full liquor license the profile of the patroiuge <br />will in all probability be much worse. Fourthly the cooking smell that will emanate from <br />this establishment will be unacceptable. When the wind is blowing from the North or <br />East we currently have to endure Rick’s Supermaricet cooking of chickens. An additional <br />smell is detrimental to the public welfare. Fifthly I would point out that the community <br />had many strong statements to make at the Town Meeting on Match 13,2003 about <br />improving Navarre, plaiming proactively for the future, and working to create a Navarre <br />we could all be proud of. PuUic welfare depends on a good environment and the <br />grantingofthisLicense will be very detrimental to that environment Sixdily the area is <br />zoned B1, which is defined in the zoning ordinance as a district intended to provide a <br />district for businesses that supply coauioditics or perform a service priauiriiy for <br />residents in the surrounding area. Some have estimated that as much as 70% of the <br />Narrows clientele are from ontiide of the city. A licensed establishment has no place <br />in a B1 district Finally how much extra woik will be put on die shoulders of our ^e <br />police force as it monitors and responds to the normal complaints that come with the <br />existence of such an establishment. <br />4. INJURY TO PROPERETY VALUES <br />The last issue is the most important one: material iqjury to property and improvements in <br />the vicinity. My bouse is oidy iqiproximately 130 feet from the subject building (about <br />the same distance between home plate and 2^ base by way of a straight line). Ihave