My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-22-2004 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2004
>
03-22-2004 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2023 8:54:44 AM
Creation date
1/19/2023 3:25:48 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
390
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
m <br />% <br />FILEM4-29M <br />27 Fabruary 2004 <br />Paga 4of4 <br />Staff finds that a hardship exists due to the challenging lalceshore portion of the lot and <br />the need for the hardcover (stairs), justifies granting the variance request for die minor <br />reduction in hardcover. <br />Conditional Use Permit Analysis <br />A thorough evaluation of the water body and the topographic, vegetation and soils <br />conditions on the site have been made, and are addressed by the following: <br />The prevention of soil erosion or the possible pollution of public waters, both <br />during and after construction; Steps have been taken to address possible soil <br />erosion during and after construction. <br />• Ihe visibility of structures and other facilities as viewed firam public waters is <br />limited; Visibility of the steps and the walls will be minimized by vegetation <br />plantings which will screen the proposed structures. <br />• The site is adequate for water supply and on-site sewage treatment; Not <br />applicable. <br />• The types, uses and numbers of watercraft that the project will generate are <br />compatible in relation to the suitability of public waters to safely accoixunodate <br />these watercraft; Not applicable. <br />City Engineer, Tom Kellogg, has reviewed the site and has provided staff with a <br />recommendation (the letter is attached as Exhibit E). The following is a summary of <br />Kellogg's comments: <br />• The proposed wall will not exceed 3 ' in height and will be screened with vegetation. <br />The wall construction is acceptable from an engineering standpoint provided the <br />installation is in accordance with the plans and specifications provided. <br />• Heavy duty silt fence with steel Uposts must be Installed along the shoreline <br />Immediately to protect the exposed slope. The silt fence should be maintained <br />throughout the construction process and remain in place until the slope is stabilized <br />and vegetation is established. <br />Issues for Consideration <br />Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? <br />Staff Recommendation <br />Planning Department staff recommends approval of the proposal subject to the City <br />Engineer's recommendations. <br />I <br />j
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.