Laserfiche WebLink
t <br />MINUTES OFTHE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Tuesday, February 17.2004 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />moving forward. Althou^ she was sympathetic to not delay the applicant, she was <br />hesitant to proceed until a process had been begun with Long Lake. <br />Although he could see that no formal approvals would be granted this evening, Johnston <br />requested that the Commission provide them with direction to continue the process moving <br />forward. He asked to be given the opportunity to address questions this evening and be <br />provided feedback as to whether they were on the right track, rather than making a mistake <br />which would cost the applicant an additional 30 days delay. <br />While the Commission believed the underlying B-6 zoning appropriate, Gaffron suggested <br />the Commission review the B-1 list of 30-3S specific uses and 8 conditional uses to see if <br />they could be added to the acceptable uses list for this PUD. The Commission reviewed the <br />B-1 uses omitting Laundromats, plumbing, electrical, heating, temporary sales- Christmas <br />tree lots, and home and garden equipment rental from the list of accept^le uses. Under <br />Conditional uses, items 1,2, 5,6, and 7 were removed, while item 8 - professional office <br />and offices of a general nature was added to the list of acceptable uses. Within the list of <br />accessory uses, item 1 was removed. No changes to the B-6 uses were suggested. <br />Trautz requested that the Conditional use Class I restaurant use be added to the permitted <br />uses section of the code for a regular use and place restrictive language upon what type of <br />food service is provided. <br />Gaffron stated that B-6 doesn't address Class II restaurants at all. which would include <br />drive-thru fast food type restaurants. <br />Hawn stated that she would not support the addition of another drive-thru restaurant, <br />although she could endorse a restaurant that serves wine/beer. <br />Gaffron stated that, if the Commission wished to restrict the type of restaurant uses they <br />would or would not allow, the Commission would need to identify aspects of what they <br />PAGE 8 of 2S