Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />commission could give the council as much guidance as possible by having a list of uses that <br />could be recommended. <br />Zugschwest: Not in favor of amending the CMP. <br />Rahn: Less in favor of amending the CMP than was in the beginning. If city is being rushed into <br />making a decision, would be opposed to amending the CMP. <br />Mabusth: Feels commission is being rushed. Why does it have to be all retail? What can’t one <br />of the loi» be office use ~ given the right mix of use may be ii< favor of amending the Comp Plan. <br />Berg: Not in favor of amending the CMP. The city just put the CMP together and to make a <br />change we need to look at all the possibilities and what exactly we want to see for the city. <br />Not in favor of amending the CMP: Berg, Fritzler, Smith, Rahn, Zugschwest, Bremer . <br />In favor of amending the CMP: Jeanne Mabusth <br />Mr. Trask stated they have reviewed Mr. Gafhon’s letter of March 1 and feel confident that the <br />msyority of ^quests can be accomplished. He said that in talking with potential buyers of Stone <br />Bay residential area a grocery store is exactly what they don ’t want They feel they have come <br />back with retail uses that correspond with other retail use at that intersection. They feel it is a <br />retail intersection. In talking about what serves the resident’s immediate needs, office space <br />brings people from out of the area to this site. Mr. Trask feels the current site plan being worked <br />on is looking at all the criteria, including having the site face “in”, and to try and find ways to <br />incorporate pond aesthetics can be accomplished. <br />In regards to signing tenants, can’t move forward to accomplish until the uses are decided. The <br />neighborhood of Stone Bay does support concept and uses proposed at this site. Mr. Trask also <br />felt they were at a positive place five months ago. <br />Page 10 of 41