My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-22-2004 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2004
>
03-22-2004 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2023 8:54:44 AM
Creation date
1/19/2023 3:25:48 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
390
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Based on the fact that that applicants have been advised to come up with a different site plan it is <br />critical, fix)m a timing standpoint and for the applicant, that the Commission reach a conceptual <br />conclusion on whether or not the Commission is ready to establish parameters and go ahead with <br />the Comp Plan Amendment and a re-zoning. Formal action is not being sought at this time, but <br />direction from the Commission is needed conceptually, that if the number of conditions you <br />established can be met that the Commission is willing to make that commitment and that would <br />be taken by staff to the City Council next Monday, March 22. The recommendation on the Comp <br />Plan Amendment must be made at this meeting in order to conform with the statutory 120-day <br />review period, which ends April 15 (prior to the next commission meeting). /h <br />Staff recommends that Planning Commission: <br />1. Discuss and make a recommendation to Council as to whether the CMP should be <br />amended to re-guide the site from primarily office to primarily retail uses. <br />2. If you recommend in favor of the amendment, you should also do the following: <br />a) Review and confirm the list of allowed zon. jg uses you determined are <br />appropriate for this property; and <br />b) Review carefully the development goals and parameters laid out in the staff <br />letter of March 1 and confirm whether these are conditions that should be <br />incorporated into the text of a CMP amendment. <br />Gaffron stated that site plan issues discussion can be postponed to a future meeting. <br />There were no public comments. <br />Page 7 of 41
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.