My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-12-2004 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
04-12-2004 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2023 10:31:02 AM
Creation date
1/19/2023 2:48:48 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
437
PDF
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, March 22, 2004 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />toward the pond as an amenity. They provided a little bit better focus toward the center <br />of the site opposed to totally focusing towards Highway 12. The traffic engineer hasn’t <br />looked the circulation and parking issues yet. Gaffron still thinks there is potential for <br />impact on the neighborhood but they understand the need for screening will be critical. <br />The last plan Gaffron reviewed was not complete in many ways and could be changed in <br />a number of ways. Tlie key issue for Gaffron was that they went away from three <br />separate uses, now we’re down to two uses, a drvv-thru issue usurping the west end <br />amenity, a pond that sneaks through in-between the two halves of the building. He <br />stated they are getting closer, but not there yet. <br />Plan 23 was introduced to staff and Council and is made a record of these minutes, <br />(and is attached with my paperwork). <br />Sansevere stated that as far as he is concerned the applicant will proceed further if they <br />keep in mind Gaffron’s recommendations. <br />Plan 23 splits one retail building on the west to accommodate a drive-through between <br />the buildings. <br />Murphy noted the changes to the Walgreen site and inquired how Walgreen’s feels about <br />the changes and will they do what is needed. <br />The applicant responded they have seen this plan and turning the building they can <br />accept. This building now has less parking around their front door which they don’t like, <br />but getting a drive-thru on the east side may be more acceptable. Their primary response <br />was that applicant should come back to them after they have something that can be <br />passed by the Council. There is no certainly, but the applicant has confideice. <br />CVS Pharmacy may have an intertJi, but are not being approached at this time. <br />PAGE 23 of 29
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).