My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-12-2004 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
04-12-2004 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2023 10:31:02 AM
Creation date
1/19/2023 2:48:48 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
437
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Ul^ <br />\ <br />\ <br />MEWTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, March 22,2004 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />Gaffron stated that the address could be addressed. Burke responded tliat he could spe <br />with his partners. <br />Gaffron stated in staffs opinion the sign at 12’ or 12’ 8” is pushing the jirnit, especially <br />for ui office use. <br />White suggested making the Orono Professional Center in smaller letters or putting on a <br />lower sign and then the tenant names couldIbe larger. <br />/ <br />\y <br />\^ •VSaasevere stated the sign exceeded and interrupted the rooflinc and it would be more <br />visually pleasing if one-foot lower. <br />Murphy stated the Council has gone a long way on previous issues related to this project. <br />\ <br />Applicant Burke also stated they went a long way.\ <br />Murphy moved and Mayor Peterson moved to deny the application bas^ on staffs <br />recommendation that the sign not exceed the 12’ 8” height approved vyitnN)(^e <br />building permit VOTE: Ayes 4; Nays 0. <br />11. #04-2974 RELIANCE DEVELOPMENT CORP., HIGHWAY 12/WlLLOW <br />DRIVE (OUTLOT A, STONEBAY) - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN <br />AMENDMENT <br />Gaffron explained Planning Commission tabled this item on February 17 pending a joint <br />work session with the Long Lake Planning Commission, which was held on March 3. At <br />that work session, the commissions exchanged infomu-tion about current and pending <br />activities along the Highway 12 corridor, and discussed whether iczcning of this site <br />PAGE 20 of 29 <br />C <br />/ <br />/ <br />V’ <br />li.ll
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.