My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-12-2004 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
04-12-2004 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2023 10:31:02 AM
Creation date
1/19/2023 2:48:48 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
437
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, March 22,2004 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />(4. ON SALE LIQUOR LICENSE PUBLIC HEARING - PA UL ODE - NA VARRE <br />LANES continued) <br />stated he has advised Council that they have the right to determine that other health and <br />safety impacts may occur and that it’s on that basis that the staff report talks about that there <br />are impacts on the neighborhood and the traffic and would be a basis on which the Council <br />could deny. <br />With respect to the larger question on the use of the property, he has not recently heard a <br />developer like Mr. Hoyt offer a moratorium, but at some point the City may wish to take a <br />look at how that area is zoned and how it zones its liquA.u’ license applications. There is not <br />currently a lot of zoning dealing with liquor licenst.; ■••xJ the Council may wish to consider <br />that. <br />Finally, in regards to the 3.2 liquor license currently in place at this site, under state law at <br />this time, it requires an independent hearing examiner be appointed and if the Council made <br />a resolution for staff to prepare a Complaint or an effort to withdraw the 3.2 liquor license <br />than it would be a requirement that the City identify and hire an independent hearing <br />examiner, have a hearing in front of the examiner, and have a report come back to the City <br />Council under which it could make a decision. <br />Sansevere stated to Mr. Ode and Mr. Keavney that he would have no problem with the <br />bowling alley opening with a pizza factory or any kind of pizza. He continued by inquiring <br />if the City has a requirement to prevent a liquor license being utilized at that site in the <br />future. <br />Attorney Barrett stated he is not sure he knows the history of the setup liquor license and <br />can’t advise Council on that question at this time. <br />White stated home is where the heart is and the community is .vherc the home is and it is not <br />surprising that all these people turned out this evening. He stated he couldn’t think of a <br />worse location to have a liquor license. He is opposed and agrees with the residents. White <br />also said he is concerned about the application process indicating the City is very tough with <br />residents that have a small amount of hardcover and we find out when we measure that the <br />whole thing is a parking lot. We make them remove that hardcover. When an applicant <br />comes in and signs a liquor license application and it is submitted to the Police Department <br />and the application has obvious errors and falsehoods, then the City has a real problem. <br />White would support getting a hearing examiner to look at this whole issue. We are tougli <br />on honesty. He is opposed to this application. <br />Mayor Peterson indicated she is opposed to this application for a liquor license not only for <br />the health, safety and welfare issues that have been brought up this evening but also because <br />a full liquor license is not an appropriate use for that location. She stated she and Mr. <br />Keavney are schoolmates and she bowled as a teenager at this bowling alley back in 1965 <br />PAGE 11 of 23
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.