Laserfiche WebLink
septrtlion from adloining homes arc now commanding very high prices among <br />these new buyers. Tht current zoning has not and will not alter this occurrancc. <br />The current toning does not acknowledge or deal with this reality. <br />Another factor is that as the land value increi.ses, the new buyers demand <br />proporticmately more eipensive new homes on that land. This has led to the <br />widespread demolition of a great and ever increasing percentage of all lakeahore <br />homes in Orono and the Lake Minnetonka area Many beautiful homes have <br />been lost to this Inevitable desire. Some beautiful and perfectly maintained <br />properties have even been intentionally allowed to fall into disrepair and neglect <br />Uijiwtiiy Iticlr complete destruction and rcpiacanciit by new houses. <br />In order to actually enforce and carry out the current two acre mimmura, <br />the City would have to forbid any re building and/or replacement of the <br />overwhelming miyority of existing homes in these zuning areas. Only a very <br />small hwidful of the currently existing properties possess the required two or <br />more acres of dry land. The City does not truthfully intend to render the <br />overwhelming majority of these valuable exi.sling piopcitics coinpictcly <br />unbuildshle and worthless to fliture owrurri. <br />Does the C!ity intend to prevent all new consiruclion in these <br />neighborhoods? Ihis is certainly nut what has actually been liippcning. <br />This would lead to the great majority of these existing properties being <br />vacant rod uninhabiUhle sub-standard tots every lime anything liappcns tu the <br />exialing houses. Over enough lime, nearly all homes will siifTcr fires, storm <br />n^cct, and eventual functional obsolescence. Stnci application of (he <br />two acre lot miniiiUim would prevail all new or rcplacaDait constniction on the <br />m^ority of properties in (huno and lead to toully vacant, unusable, and <br />wofthlesa properties over time. <br />This clearly was not the intent of the lot size minimum, hardcover, am! <br />setback mniiieiiienls. Ihcse were intended to protect and enhance the property <br />oworni* ei\joymcnl and value, not forbid rod totally destroy it <br />Specifically around Lake Minnetonka, wc have all witnessed many larger <br />p rop erty owners who are very attached to their land and very much wish to sell <br />It intact and undivided, only to find that much mailer adjouiing properties are <br />selling for as much or more than their own larger property. Often sel' ng much <br />faster aial more easily. Hven when a seller manages to find one of the very few <br />buyers who desire and can liTord a larger undivided <br />acreage, the seller rarely reccivc.s the tnie underlying fair value for (heir <br />property. <br />Then some later owner docs subdivide that same property and obtains a <br />wildly higher value for the exact same property. The fact is that over time largo <br />properties usually are subdivided regardless of zoning. Someone always <br />manages to obtain subdivision eventually. Ihis leaves all of the previous sellers <br />who cither did not subdivide, or were fo^idden to subdivide, cheated out of this <br />very significate value of their |>ropcrty. 'Hiis is completely unfair and, in actual <br />fact and result, docs not hold everyone to ihc same zoning requirements and <br />enforcement a.s fairness and equal treatmeni demand <br />In addition, the current requirements were established when only <br />individual sewer septic systems were being used by each and every property in <br />llicsc portions of Orono. Now these areas have installed costly city sewer service <br />(paid by these same property owners based on their specific Int size) to all <br />properties, specifically to prevent the efferts on the liike and groundwater that <br />potential lii^r density would cause or wor' ;n. Unce the city sewer system was <br />luslallcd. it changed die situation dramatically and affected dm juatincalion for <br />Ihc imposition of these old zoning rcquircmcnls. <br />The runolTfroin building roofs, driveways, terraces, and similar hardcover <br />is not the major cause of water quality pn>hlems. Thc.se surfaces do not cunCain <br />or endlessly bleed major pollutants. The major problems are obviously caused <br />by homouwncni who cuntinuously sraolher their homes, lawns, and gardens with <br />evay kind of toxin, pollutant, herbicide, pesticide, and fertilizer known to <br />mankind. One such owner's behavior can easily do far more damage tu the water <br />quality, groundwater, and area residents than huge amounts of clean hardcover <br />ever could, llic aitioiinl of additional natural vegetative filtering that such <br />abusive behavior would roquirc to mitigate is far more than any of the codes <br />provide. There thmild he far less emphasis on lot size, setbacks, and hanicover <br />and far more emphasis on harmful owner behavior <br />I believe the City of Orono should change the 7onmg requiremmis to <br />allow all larger property owners to subdivide to a degree which will match the <br />actual surrounding properties, and in (his way sto|} depriving the larger property <br />owners of their true underlying property value. The City .should change the <br />zoning to prevent (he nearly universal iiced to obtain multiple and extieme <br />variances for any changes tu the overwhelming majority of all <br />P.5 P.fc