My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-12-2004 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2004
>
04-12-2004 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2023 10:31:02 AM
Creation date
1/19/2023 2:48:48 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
437
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
W4-2992 <br />March 15.2004 <br />Pace 6 of 7 <br />further from the lake than before, which in turn made the applicant’s home non- <br />conforming and thus creating a hardship. The Planning Commission should discuss the <br />impacts of changing the envelope of the structure at this comer and whether views are <br />obstructed. <br />Staff would make the following recommendations in regards to the criteria for “undue <br />hardship” pertinent to this .application: <br />1. <br />2. <br />3. <br />4. <br />5. <br />“The property in question caruiot be put to a reasonable use if used under <br />conditions allowed by tlie official controls." <br />The property is currently non-conforming \iith respect to side setback, hardcover <br />and average lake shore setback Any changes, whether the non-conformities <br />increase or not, requires variance approvals Therefore, the official controls <br />make it virtually impossible for the property owner to improve his home. <br />“The plight of the landowner is due tr circumstances unique to his property not <br />created by the landowner." <br />The applicant hasn't created any of the non-conformities on the property. The <br />property yvas developed pre-current Zoning Ordinance and the applicant <br />complies with all the vari ince approvals granted in 1992. <br />"The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality." <br />The essential character of this neighborhood is narrow lots with tall, 2 and V: <br />story homes. The applicant's property is actually double the width of his <br />neighbor's and will only be 2 stories rather than 2 and '/: thus not creating an <br />"out of the ordinary" circumstance. <br />"Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if <br />reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter." <br />Not applicable <br />"Undue hardship also includes, but is not limited to, inadequate access to direct <br />sunligb.t for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered <br />construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 116J.06, Subd. 2, when in <br />harmony with this Chapter." <br />Not applicable <br />“The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a <br />variance any use that is not permitted under this Chapter for property in the zone <br />where the affected person's land is located." <br />The improvements proposed are allowed uses under the zoning requii ements of <br />the property. <br />"The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a <br />one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling." <br />Not applicable
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.