Laserfiche WebLink
i«3>2M2 <br />November 17.3003 <br />Pa|«5of7 <br />rebuild situations. Staff will hold to this suggestion as new homes have consistently been <br />held to 1 SVo. No hardship exists to allow structural coverage in excess of 15% due to die <br />allowable building pad of 3,093 square feet as shown on Exhibit J. This is more than <br />double what the ordinance allows for in particularly small lots where a minimum of 1JOO <br />square feet is allowed. <br />Staff would support a lot area variance as this is a routine variance which is required with <br />rebuild situations where the lot doesn’t meet the area requirement for the respective <br />zoning district. The lot is a legal lot of record which requires approval of this variance <br />request. <br />Staff would make the following recommendations in regards to the criteria for “undue <br />hardship** pertinent to this application: <br />1. <br />2. <br />3. <br />5. <br />“The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under <br />conditions allowed by the official controls.* <br />A reasonably sized home could be placed on the lot meeting all requirements. <br />“The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property cot <br />created by the landowner." <br />There are no circumstances unique to this property which would justify graraing <br />of the variances as proposed. Staff has indicated that a hardcover variance could <br />be explored due to the shallowness of the lot and the needfor a turnaround bur <br />44% is excessive to what has consistently been approved with rebuild siiuations. <br />as is the 19% structural coverage. A reasonably sized home could be constructed <br />on the lot meeting all requirements. <br />“The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the localit>'.* <br />The nature of the lot at shown in Exhibit 1 is smaller lots with modest footprirjs <br />and 2-2 Vt story homes. This house as proposed may alter the essential <br />character of the LR — JC zoning locality along Shadywood Road <br />‘Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if <br />reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter.* <br />The applicant has indicated tfutt her older parents would be moving in which <br />causes the needfor a larger house. This lot Jits within the applicant's budget <br />however, stafffeels that this lot cannot support the amount of hardcover and <br />structural coverage the applicants feel they need <br />'Undue hardship also includes, but is not limited to, inadequate access to direct <br />sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered <br />construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 116J.06. Subd. 2. whec in <br />harmony with this Chapter.* <br />j <br />‘ i <br />♦ ' <br />J