My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-08-2004 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2004
>
03-08-2004 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2023 10:28:38 AM
Creation date
1/19/2023 2:13:53 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
468
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
#04-2971 3220-3240 Watertown Road <br />January 14,2004 <br />Page 2 <br />Regulatory Impacts <br />The following regulatory impacts have come into play since this property was originally subdivided <br />in 1990: <br />I. Shoreland Ordinance Impacts <br />Prior to adoption of the Shoreland Ordinance in February 1992, Orono did not have a specific <br />setback requirement from tributary streams or creeks, and at best a 26' wetland sedsack was likely <br />the only setback enforced for structures. Furthermore, the City had no hardcover limitation <br />applicable to tributaries. The City had enforced a 7S' septic system setback from creeks and wetlands <br />since the late 1970's; tested sites for Lot 1 were accqited at less than a 7S' setback. <br />The Shoreland Ordinance established standards and conditions for Stubbs Bay Creek (AKA Classen <br />Creek) including structural and septic system setbacks from its Ordinary High Water Level (OHWL) <br />as well as hardcover limitations, tree removal regulations, etc. These standards have placed <br />numerous added restrictions on development of the Seim Orono Addition lots that were not in effect <br />when those lots were created. The primary impact is that parts of the proposed driveway would not <br />be allowed today. <br />In discussions leading to adoption of the Shoreland Ordinance, staff and City Council acknowledged <br />that many existing structures would become nonconforming, and a number of already platted lots <br />would likewise be negatively affected. It was the intent of the City to deal with these through the <br />variance process as each case came up. The City did not "grandfather ” existing vacant lots which as <br />a result of the Shoreland Ordinances became substandard. Development of the Senn lots, including <br />construction of the driveway and bridge, are subject to the current regulations in effect today. <br />II. Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) RefuUuions Impacts <br />Prior to enactment of the WC A Regulations by the legislature in 1991, the City had few guidelines <br />for determining the boundaries of wetlands. Furthermore, the specific wetlands protected by Orono <br />ordinances were limited to those identified in the 1974 Orono Wetland Inventory maps. While that <br />inventory map showed substantial areas of wetland on the Seim Orono Addition property, it did not <br />specifically identify the creek. <br />Because the original subdivision was completed before WCA was enacted, the wetlands on the <br />property were not delineated per today’s standards. The City merely determined at that time that <br />areas below the 970' contour would be considered as wetland. However, the wetlands have now <br />been delineated as depicted on the survey, Exhibit C, and generally follow the 968' contour.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.