My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-23-2004 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
02-23-2004 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2023 8:52:34 AM
Creation date
1/19/2023 1:20:52 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
357
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MONDAY, FEBRUARY 9,2004 <br />APPROVAL OF MINUTES <br />*3. Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of January 26,2004 <br />Murphy moved, and White seconded, to approve the Minutes of the Regular Council <br />Meeting of January 26,2004. <br />Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS—RICK RICE, REPRESENTATIVE <br />See comments followinp Item 4. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS—JEANNE MABUSTH, <br />REPRESENTATIVE <br />None. <br />PUBLIC COMMENTS <br />None. <br />ZONING ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT <br />4. #03*2958 Judson Dayton, 2885 Little Orchard Way—Variances—Resolution <br />No. 5110. <br />Gundlach stated that the original request was for renewal of a variance that allowed a bam <br />to remain on the property absent a principal structure. With the original variance the bam <br />was to be re-located to the rear of the lot. However, the bam was never moved, and the <br />applicant applied for a renewal variance to again re-locate it. which was denied by the <br />Planning Commission. They felt the circumstances under which the original variance was <br />approved were no longer valid. Originally, the variance was approved under the condition <br />that a principal structure would be built. The applicant indicated he would not be building <br />on the lot. Instead, the Planning Commission approved two new variances to allow the <br />bam to remain, contingent upon the applicant combining his two lots at 2885 Little <br />Orchard Way and 825 Old Crystal Bay Road S. by July 31,2004, That way the bam <br />would have a principal structure to be accessory to. <br />' I <br />i
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.