My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-23-2004 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2004
>
02-23-2004 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2023 8:52:34 AM
Creation date
1/19/2023 1:20:52 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
357
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r <br />#04-2976 <br />January 13,2004 <br />Page 4 <br />Required Findings <br />In order to approve the CUP, Council must make the following two findings: <br />- the proposed use of the accessory structure with plumbing will not be detrimental to the <br />residential character of the neighborhood. <br />- the plumbing fixtures proposed are in keeping with die intended use of the accessory <br />building. <br />Planning Conunission should ask the applicant to confirm the intended uses of this building once <br />the kitchen is removed, to ensure that the above findings are satisfied. <br />Kitchen removal should include the following, in the opinion of staff: <br />1 . Remove stove and microwave oven, if any. <br />2. Remove refiigerator. <br />3. Remove kitchen sink and associated plumbing. <br />Planning Commission should confirm that these are &e appropriate fixtures to be removed to result <br />in the conversion fiom a ‘guest house* use to an ‘accessory stmcture with plumbing* use. The <br />fixtures to be removed will be documented as 'not allowed to be reinstalled’ in the CUP resolution. <br />Issues for Cottsideration <br />1 . Are the neighborhood impacts of the nonconforming aspects of the stmcture so minimal as <br />to be a non-issue regarding this CUP request? <br />2. With removals of existing kitchen facilities, the structure will still have a bathroom. Is this <br />consistent with the ^plicant’ s proposed use for the structure? Are die fixtures suggested for <br />removal by staff the appropriate fixtures to be re**ioved? <br />3. Does Pluming Commission have any concerns regarding this proposed CUP? <br />Staff Recommendation <br />Staff recommends ^proval of the CUP for plumbing in the accessory structure, subject to the <br />following: <br />1 . Applicants to execute standard 'use limitation* covenants as required by City Ordinance. <br />2. Conversion from 'guest house* status '*'.ccessory building with plumbing* status will <br />require removal of existing kitchen facilities including stove and microwave oven, if any; <br />re^gerator; and kitchen sink and associated plumbing. <br />i
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.