Laserfiche WebLink
trap system both inside and outside for vmshing, which is later removed by a licensed <br />(#03-2923 STEVAN WAGNER, 3609 SHORELINE DRIVE, COMMERCIAL SITE <br />PLAN REVIEW - Continued) <br />hazardous waste hauler. <br />With regard to the proposed diagram of the site, Hawn questioned whether Wagner ’s <br />intent was to add more to the site and expand his operation. <br />Wagner maintained that he had no intention of expanding the operation, and in fact, <br />believed he had maxed out his facility. He stated that it is his intent to beautify the whole <br />site and make it more comfortable. <br />Hawn asked whether additional hardtopping of the surfaces was intended. <br />Wagn er indicated that he had no intent to blacktop the lower area, and believed this <br />woiUd not be feasible. <br />Curtis interjected that, during the site walk, Hennepin County did not feel blacktopping <br />the lower area was necessary at this site. She pointed out that further discussion will take <br />place between the City Engineer, Applicant, and the City with regard to stormwater <br />maiurgement before being heard by the City Council. <br />Acting Chair Mabusth voiced her concern that the ’use ’ of this site would be increased. <br />She agreed with Hawn that the site use had been maxed and suggested that the City take <br />an inventory or record the specific items that exist on the property currently. <br />Rahn stated that the renovation would hopefully alleviate the concerns expressed by the <br />Commission, since some of the pieces of equipment could be stowed away more readily. <br />He recommended the City use the plan as a record to track increased use. <br />Acting Chair Mabusth moved, Hawn seconded, to recommend approval of <br />Application #03-2923, Stevan Wagner, 3609 Shoreline Drive, granting approval of <br />the proposal subject to the following conditions being met: <br />1. City Engineer’s recommendations must be implemented. <br />2. Compliance with all other Jurisdictional controls is maintained. <br />3. Compliance with City Code 58-l(a) Maintenance of Private Property prior to <br />being placed on the City Council agenda for final review <br />VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0.