My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-23-2004 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2004
>
02-23-2004 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2023 8:52:34 AM
Creation date
1/19/2023 1:20:52 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
357
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Chair Smith concurred, stating that she would look favorably upon further effort to store <br />less equipment outdoors. She questioned whether the Commission should limit the type <br />or amount of equipment. <br />Rahn felt they should not attempt to further limit the type or amount of equipment <br />necessary for him to run his business. <br />Hawn suggested they have him designate a specific number of stalls for his items in the <br />schematic. <br />Gaffron pointed out that the business is allowed a certain number of parking stalls, <br />warehousing may require fewer; however, rental may require more. <br />Mabusth asked how many trucks the business typically houses. <br />Wagner stated that, between Budget and Ryder, they have 7-10 trucks on hand. He <br />indicated that he could draw up the landscape plan, as requested, designating where those <br />trucks will go. <br />Rahn stated that the site plan detail phase will allow him to do this. <br />Fritzler maintained that the City may need to be more restrictive widi this applicant, if the <br />business requires more than most other businesses in the zone. <br />Hawn agreed that a specific site plan would be helpful, since this business has been found <br />to be acceptable. <br />(»6) M3-2923 STEVAN WAGNER, 3607 SHORELINE DRIVE, Continued <br />Chair Smitli asked for comment on gravel versus blacktop. <br />Mabusth stated that she believed that gravel had been recommended by the Engineer the <br />last time due to the business* proximity to the wetlands. <br />Wagner pointed out that, long ago, gravel was not considered hardcover and was <br />preferable to blacktop in containing some of the runoff. <br />Mabusth suggested the City allow that some kind of concrete pad be placed near the <br />tanks and wetland for containment purposes, a waste trap. She further suggested that the <br />western access drive be paved if the Engineer agrees. <br />Woody believed the Engineer would support a paved apron on the west <br />Hawn recontmended the applicant gather this information and report back to the <br />Commission. <br />I <br />I <br />I
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.