Laserfiche WebLink
eastern side lot line abuts another B-1 district. Based on the size of the business, it is <br />required to supply 11 parking stalls; however, currently there are 18 stalls. <br />Foth noted that a drainage and surface water management plan should be submitted to the <br />City for Engineer review prior to final approval with two-foot contour interval or spot <br />elevations on a 100-foot grid if the two-foot contours are over 100 feet apart. <br />The applicant has proposed additional vegetative screening between the west side of the <br />proposed building and the western drive. In addition, a lighting plan has not been <br />provided with the application. The applicant should address how or whether the <br />individual buildings, entryways, or parking lot will be illuminated. <br />With regard to the building quality, Foth explained that the applicant has proposed <br />vertical wood siding with a field stone base for the exterior fa9ade of the building. The <br />Planning Commission should discuss whether these “residential ” materials are <br />appropriate for the B-1 district. <br />In conclusion, Foth presented a summary of issues for discussion: <br />1. Is the outdoor storage use non-conforming? Should it be allowed to be improved <br />and/or expanded? <br />2. Should the building be constructed to accommodate all of the equipment storage for <br />the business, including the equipment currently being stored outdoors? <br />3. Should one or both of the accessory structures be removed? <br />4. Should, if permitted to remain, the outdoor storage be restricted to a specific amount, <br />type and location of equipment? Should additional screening be installed? <br />5. The west and soudi lots on the property are gravel. Is gravel an appropriate paricing <br />surface for a business district? Should all of the lots be provided with curb and <br />gutter? <br />(M6) m-2923 STEVAN WAGNER, 3607 SHORELINE DRIVE, Continued <br />6. Is the vertical wood siding as proposed an tq)propriate exterior wall finish for a <br />commercial building? <br />7. Should the pole sign be relocated to a conforming location? <br />8. Will there be tenants in the other building on the property? How will that use impact <br />the site? <br />9. Are there any other issues or concerns with this ^)plication? <br />Foth indicated that it would be staffs recommendation: <br />. % <br />; <br />!i <br />5 <br />i j <br />i <br />i