My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-23-2004 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2004
>
02-23-2004 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2023 8:52:34 AM
Creation date
1/19/2023 1:20:52 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
357
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />orono planning commission meeting <br />Monday, October 20,2003 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />m M3-2923 STEVAN WAGNER, 3607SHOREUNE DRIVE, Continued <br />Chair Smith asked for comment on gravel versus blacktop. <br />Mabwth stated that she believed that gravel had been recommended by the Engineer the <br />last time due to the business’ proximity to the wetlands. <br />Wagner pointed out that, long ago, gravel was not considered hardcover and was <br />preferable to blacktop in containing some of the runoff. <br />Mabusth suggested the City allow that some kind of concrete pad be placed near the tanVg <br />and wetland for contai^ent purposes, a waste trap. She further suggested that the western <br />access drive be paved if the Engineer agrees. <br />Woody believed the Engineer would support a paved apron on the west. <br />Hawn recommended the ^plicant gather this information and report back to the <br />Commission. <br />Wagner stated that he was facing time restraints if he were forced to wait to report back <br />next month. <br />Hawn suggested the Commission review the appUcation and schematic during theii <br />November work session. <br />Chair Smith asked if the Commissicn found the exterior finish and sign acceptable. <br />Hawn stated that, personally, she would prefer horirontal, but was comfortable with the <br />sign and siding as proposed. <br />Wagner stated that the proposed sign would not be as tall and extend less close to the road <br />than the existu;g sign. <br />Rahn stated that the proposed sign did not seem out of place. <br />Chair Smith suggested the applicant supply the Commission with specific detail, a lighting <br />and landscaping plan, runoff and drainage plans, stalls, bays. etc. before they move the <br />application forward to Council. She recommended the applicant also consider overhead <br />doors and paving the west entrance, subject to the Engineer’s report. <br />Wagner stated that he would get those items done to meet the work session dradlinr <br />Mabusth asked what the shed was used for in the back and suggested that it be moved in <br />order to use its current location to store other items out of sight. <br />Page 12 of 29 <br />I I
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.