My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-23-2004 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2004
>
02-23-2004 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2023 8:52:34 AM
Creation date
1/19/2023 1:20:52 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
357
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
FILEM3-2923 <br />Cetobar9,2003 <br />Pag*9ori <br />occupied by a building.” The frontage is 250’ along Shoreline Drive, allowing the <br />property 250 s.f. of signage. Additionally, no indi\-idual sign may exceed SO s.f. Anew <br />pole sign is proposed at 83 s.f and wall signs totaling 67 s.f. The property is alio wd <br />signage up to 250 s.f The proposed signage of 150 s.f is in compliance with Zoning <br />Ordinance requirements. <br />Landscaping Plan <br />The applicant has proposed additional vegetative screening bem een the w est side of the <br />proposed building and the western drive. The western property line is screened with a <br />buffer of trees over 6’ tall. The Planning Commission should discuss whether the <br />proposed and existing vegetation is adequate for screening the outdoor storage in the <br />western parking/storage lot. <br />LighHng <br />A lighting plan has not been provided with the application. The applicant should address <br />how or whether the individual buildings, entryways. or p<arking lot will be illuminated. <br />BuUding OuaMtv and Materials <br />The attached sheets labeled A1*A5 depict the floor plans and elevations for the proposed <br />building. The iq)proved exterior wall finishes as designated by City Code must be frtce <br />brick, natural stone, specially designed precast concrete units, factory fabricated and <br />finished metal framed panel constructioa or other materials as may be approved by the <br />Council. Combinations of such materials shall be permiced. The applicant has proposed <br />vertical wood siding with a field stone base for the exterior facade of the building. The <br />Planning Coimnission should discuss whether these **rerldentiar’ materials are <br />appropriate for the B*l district. <br />Summary of tssuei for discussion; <br />1. Is the outdoor storage use non-confonning? Should h be allowed to be improved <br />and/or expanded? <br />2. Should the building be constructed to accommodate sU of the equipment storage for <br />the business, including the equipment currently being stored outdoors? <br />3 . Should one or both of the accessory stnictures be removed? <br />4. Should, if permitted to remain, the outdoor storage be restricted to a specific amount, <br />type and location of equipment? Should additional screening be installed? <br />5. The west and south lots on the propert>- are gravel. Is gravel an appropriate paridng <br />surface for a business district? Should all of the lots be provided with curb and <br />gutter? <br />...uaaJbllil <br />f
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.