My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-23-2004 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2004
>
02-23-2004 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2023 8:52:34 AM
Creation date
1/19/2023 1:20:52 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
357
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
I'^5.3 Inventory and Assessment of Wetlands <br />5.3.1 Wetland Inventory <br />As stated earlier, the City's objective is to protect, enhonce, and/or <br />restore wetlands that may be directly affected by runoff os development <br />and redevelopment occurs. Therefore, only those wetlands located <br />within 20 feet of a proposed or existing stormwater outlet pipe were <br />inventoried and mapped as part of the SWMP. This inventory also served <br />os the base of information for development of other parts of the wetland <br />management plan. <br />The wetlands inventoried for this SWMP are listed in Appendix I and are <br />shown on the SWMP System Map. <br />5.3.2 Stormwater Susceptibility Assessment <br />The Guidance For Evaluating Urban Storm Water and Snowmelt Runoff <br />Impacts To Wetlands was the source material for rating a wetland's <br />susceptibility to runoff. Potential impacts associated with storm and <br />meltwater runoff include fluctuation in water levels (bourTce) within the <br />wetland, the duration of inundation at the varying bounce elevations, <br />and the quality of the water being directed to the wetland. A given <br />wetiand's susceptibility to ojnoff Is dependent on the wetland type, and <br />the characteristics arxi quality of its plant community. <br />As an example, a sedge meadow, which likes a particular hydrologic <br />regime is much more susceptible than a floodplain forest, which depends <br />on fluctuating levels of water associated with seasortal flooding Also, a <br />wet meadow with a variety of grasses and flowers is more sensitive than <br />one dominated by reed canary gross. The runoff susceptibility rating for <br />each of the evaluated wetlands is indicated by color-coding on the <br />system map. The ratings described in the guidance document are <br />❖ Highly Susceptible <br />❖ Moderately Susceptible <br />❖ Slightly Susceptible <br />❖ Least Susceptible. <br />Further discussion on susceptibility and associated wetlarxl community <br />descriptions, modified from the Guidance For Evaluating Urban Storm <br />Water and Snowmelt Runoff Impacts To Wetlands, is presented in <br />Appendix H. Each susceptibility rating category describes different <br />wetland types, including plant commurtities and hydrology. <br />OtyarOrono <br />Surftct mter Manag&neri Plan <br />1 <br />A
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.