Laserfiche WebLink
M3-29SI <br />January 20,2004 <br />faga 4 of 4 <br />Issuci for Co0sidenitioB <br />1. Should any variances be approved to allow the bam? <br />2. Does the bam have any historical significance? <br />3. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? <br />Staff Recommendation <br />Require the bam to be reduced to 832 s.f. or less to alleviate the need for any planning <br />actions, and if the parcels are combined the bam must be moved to the location indicated <br />on Exhibit B and if they are not combined than the bam must be moved to a conforming <br />location on 82S Old Crystal Bay Road. <br />■ 4i ' <br />* I